View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
rajulan
New User
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 66 Location: India
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am a Mainframe DB2 DBA. My primary skill set is DB2 DBA. I would like to learn some secondary skill set like IMS or ADABAS. I can learn ADABAS easily as I have some options. But I think it is good to add IMS skill as a secondary. Can anyone suggest me?
Moderators,
I want to change my user name in this forum for my privacy. Please help me on this. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rajulan
New User
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 66 Location: India
|
|
|
|
Added to the above,
What are the general activities we do as a IMS DBA? Can anyone please explain this. If I want to learn IMS dba activities, how to prepare this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 19243 Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Quote: |
I want to change my user name in this forum for my privacy. Please help me on this. |
Suggest you send a PM to mcmillan (our site admin).
Quote: |
What are the general activities we do as a IMS DBA? |
Over the years, i've provided database support for more than 15 db products on all 3 main platforms (manframe, unix, win-boxes) and the actual dba work is quite similar. . . The mechanics and buzzwords are quite product/platform specific but can be learned with only a bit of frustration |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rajulan
New User
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 66 Location: India
|
|
|
|
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Heindba
New User
Joined: 11 May 2010 Posts: 16 Location: South Africa
|
|
|
|
I would Say IMS is A Good Idea but be very careful as IMS and all the other DB packages are moving out while DB2 is moving up to different versions and DB Ranges.
I know some companies are now use DB9 already. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6248 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Heindba
New User
Joined: 11 May 2010 Posts: 16 Location: South Africa
|
|
|
|
Which is quite true I actually forgot about that one though, my bad. but very few companies use Adabas as it has become way to expensive. Also another nice DB package to learn is Datacom but I wouldn't suggest it thoug, although it is very user friendly according to me, it is also on it's way out of the market. IMS still will be a good idea as there are still quite a few companies that use IMS, just needed to correct my statement |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bill O'Boyle
CICS Moderator
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 2501 Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
|
|
|
|
In shops I've seen customers define a DB2 Stored Procedure as well as use ODBA to access IMS, also from this same Stored Procedure.
ODBA ===> Open Database Access
OTMA ===> Open Transaction Manager Access (Protocol)
I would have to agree that IMS would be the better learning path to take than ADABAS.
Click here ===> www.mainframezone.com/it-management/open-access-to-ims-with-odba-and-otma
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dbzTHEdinosauer
Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Oct 2006 Posts: 6966 Location: porcelain throne
|
|
|
|
Depends on the products being used by potential employers.
IMS - widely used
ADABAS - is a start to learning about SAP... if you look at the job vacancies in europe and USA, SAP is very popular. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kjeld
Active User
Joined: 15 Dec 2009 Posts: 365 Location: Denmark
|
|
|
|
IMS is still alive and kicking. You should be aware that hierachical databases like the IMS DL/1 has commonly been abandoned for DB2 or other relational databases also in IMS applications, so there is no need to learn IMS DB unless you have a specific need.
On the other hand, being proficient in VSAM technologies comes a long way on mainframe database systems. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dr_te_z
New User
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 71 Location: Zoetermeer, the Netherlands
|
|
|
|
Depends on your age I'd say. When you're relatively young and want to make your money working with mainframes for the next few decades:
YES! Learn IMS!
They/we are still around to teach you.... do not wait too long. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6248 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
dr_te_z wrote: |
YES! Learn IMS!
They/we are still around to teach you.... do not wait too long. |
Thanks, there are few of us, for sure, who look up to you guys
Have a good one, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
prino
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Feb 2009 Posts: 1314 Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
|
|
|
|
Recently was in Germany, where someone demonstrated using SQL to access IMS, doing not just retrieval, but also updates. Seems the current economic climate has made a lot of companies reconsider moving from IMS to DB2... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 19243 Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Many IMS implementations did not move to DB2 because of the performance issues with DB2.
If the performance of IMS/SQL is similar to the performance of navigational IMS, the push to convert those high-performance systems DB2 may fade. . . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6248 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
someone demonstrated using SQL to access IMS |
I believe, it's known as Shadow's Interface for IMS/DB, did they mention about something like that? Did they talk about IMS-DB2-store procedures too? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
prino
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Feb 2009 Posts: 1314 Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
|
|
|
|
Anuj Dhawan wrote: |
Quote: |
someone demonstrated using SQL to access IMS |
I believe, it's known as Shadow's Interface for IMS/DB, did they mention about something like that? Did they talk about IMS-DB2-store procedures too? |
It's not that, just wait, and hopefully, see. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6248 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Sure, i look forward to that.
have a good one, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kjeld
Active User
Joined: 15 Dec 2009 Posts: 365 Location: Denmark
|
|
|
|
Anuj Dhawan wrote: |
Quote: |
someone demonstrated using SQL to access IMS |
I believe, it's known as Shadow's Interface for IMS/DB, did they mention about something like that? Did they talk about IMS-DB2-store procedures too? |
I found a website marketing a product called z/Shadow providing a client db connection service to both IMS/DB, DB2 and some other db products, using an SQL based calling interface.
The product is allegedly an alternative to accessing, say, IMS databases through IMS message application services from decentralized server platforms.
Dick Scherrer wrote: |
Many IMS implementations did not move to DB2 because of the performance issues with DB2. |
I have not heard that DB2 should still be a slow performer compared to native IMS DB. But choosing a database system is not just a matter of performance. Hierarchical database modelling is becoming a lost discipline, and products like the abovementioned are just an example of a tool to circumvent the need for mainframe application programmers with IMS skills, and to keep legacy database systems alive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 19243 Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Quote: |
But choosing a database system is not just a matter of performance. |
No, most of these decisions are not made with any major consideration of performance - as long as the choice can do the job. Many larger systems could not run on db2 - the system could not do a day's work in a day. And volumes were increasing not decreasing. . .
Usually (from what i've seen) the choice of a database system is not based on technical merit of any kind. . .
As the hardware and the operating system as well as DB2 are from IBM it is to be expected that someday DB2 perfomance will not be an issue
As several learned folks have said over the years - "If DB2 was not an IBM product, if would have been withdrawn years ago". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|