|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
vasanthz
Global Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 1745
Location: Tirupur, India
|
|
|
|
Suppose there is a daily job that runs for 2 hours 5 minutes of CPU time, and we tune it so that it completes in 5 minutes CPU. How to showcase the benefit of 2 CPU hours savings?
In an SCRT environment where the bill to IBM is mainly based on peak 4 hour rolling average. If the CPU saved is not in the peak 4 HRA then how can we quantify the benefit, if possible.
I had a thought that "CPU not used is still CPU available for other processes to use" so there is one benefit.
Are there any other thoughts on this? Thank you
Regards, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Willy Jensen
Active Member
Joined: 01 Sep 2015
Posts: 736
Location: Denmark
|
|
|
|
| That amount of reduced cpu time will most likely also lead to much reduced runtime, so other resources are held for a much shorter time. It also means that you have much more time to fix any runtime errrors and still be within the batch window, if you have one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vasanthz
Global Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 1745
Location: Tirupur, India
|
|
|
|
| Thank you Willy Jensen, that's one more point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
