|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
socker_dad
Active User
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 176
Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
|
|
We switched from SFT to MFT. Don't know (or care) why - that was a 30,000-foot decision. Now I am picking up the pieces. Here's my MFT stuff:
| Code: |
locsite fwfriendly
ASCII CRLF
cd fins
cd CB Reports
PUT 'EXCH300.Z3000ALL.FILE' TESST_3.TXT
QUIT |
Here's the flaming results:
| Code: |
EZA1736I locsite friendly
EZA1460I Command:
EZA1736I ASCII CRLF
EZA1701I >>> TYPE A
200 Command okay,
EZA1460I Command:
EZA1736I cd fins
EZA1701I >>> CWD fins
250 Directory changed to /fins
EZA1460I Command:
EZA1736I cd CB Reports
EZA1701I >>> CWD CB Reports
250 Directory changed to /fins/CB Reports
EZA1460I Command:
EZA1736I PUT 'EXCH300.Z3000ALL.FILE' TESST_3.TXT
EZA1701I >>> SITE FIXrecfm 383 LRECL=383 RECFM=FB BLKSIZE=27959
502 Command SITE not implemented for FIXRECFM
EZA1701I >>> PASV
227 Entering Passive Mode (nnn,nnn,n,nn,nn,nnn)
EZA1701I >>> STOR TEST_3.TXT
150 File status okay; about to open data connection.
EZA2870I TLS security mechanism negotiation failed - data connection closed
425 Can't open data connection.
EZA1735I Std Return Code = 27425, Error Code = 000417
EZA1701I >>> QUIT
221 Goodbye. |
1. I can probably put the two CD commands in one
2. What the heck am I missing with the TLS Security error???
Our Network Operations team doesn't realize that there is an IBM mainframe, so they have been absolutely no help. What do you guys suggest? This wasn't happening in test! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joerg.Findeisen
Senior Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 1040
Location: Bamberg, Germany
|
|
|
|
With FTP you probably would have to code:
| Code: |
| PGM=FTP,PARM='-a TLS -e -x' |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vasanthz
Global Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 1708
Location: Tiruppur, India
|
|
|
|
| I've faced similar connection issues with handshake, One possible cause is that, atleast one encryption algorithm needs to be common between the client and Server to communicate. If there are no common negotiating algorithms then handshake would fail. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vasanthz
Global Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 1708
Location: Tiruppur, India
|
|
|
|
| I will research where the parm is |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8683
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
| I would look at the allowed protocols in /etc/pagent and compare to what the other side is trying to use. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
socker_dad
Active User
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 176
Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
|
|
I finally found a network guy who was willing to work with me and we discovered that the clown who set up the folders on our MFT server had set a higher access authority on the subfolder over the root folder.
This means that we had to develop a "back door" solution to access the production subfolder through the test root folder. These people have jobs and they walk among us, having no accountability for their stupidity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
