|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
imagines
New User
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Location: Italy
|
|
|
|
Hi
i use this util to compare two Fb file .
why when detect a difference give different rows number logicl/physical etcc?
| Code: |
IEB221I RECORDS ARE NOT EQUAL
DDNAME = SYSUT1
PHYSICAL RECORD NUMBER = 00002798 LOGICAL RECORD NUMBER WITHIN PHYSICAL RECORD = 00000057
00001CF0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F2F3F3F9F4F9C9E3D2F0F5F0F8F8F2F5F64040404040404040404040404040000000000C404040019930921C000000
000C019930921C0160457000000CF000001CF0F0F2F3F34040D4C9C7D9F2F0F0F160F0F9F2F8
DDNAME = SYSUT2
PHYSICAL RECORD NUMBER = 00000520 LOGICAL RECORD NUMBER WITHIN PHYSICAL RECORD = 00000125
00001CF0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F2F3F3F9F4F9C9E3D2F0F5F0F8F8F2F5F24040404040404040404040404040000000000C404040019930921C000000
000C019930921C0160457000000CF000001CF0F0F2F3F34040D4C9C7D9F2F0F0F160F0F9F2F8
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marso
REXX Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 1353
Location: Israel
|
|
|
|
Can you show the block size for each file ?
IBM recommends using the SuperC utility instead of IEBCOMPR |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
imagines
New User
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Location: Italy
|
|
|
|
| SuperC is Too much slowly. I can't use it |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dneufarth
Active User
Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 419
Location: Inside the SPEW (Southwest Ohio, USA)
|
|
|
|
| As requested previously, are the block size of each dataset the same? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prino
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 1306
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
|
|
|
|
| imagines wrote: |
| SuperC is Too much slowly. I can't use it |
Bullthis! With SuperC you get well annotated output and not the AD 1970 crap above.
Suggestion? Add
to your SuperC control statements. And run SuperC in batch! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
imagines
New User
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Location: Italy
|
|
|
|
| dneufarth wrote: |
| As requested previously, are the block size of each dataset the same? |
blocksize is different . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dneufarth
Active User
Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 419
Location: Inside the SPEW (Southwest Ohio, USA)
|
|
|
|
| Different block sizes is the reason you see different physical and logical positions in your comparison. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
imagines
New User
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Location: Italy
|
|
|
|
| dneufarth wrote: |
| Different block sizes is the reason you see different physical and logical positions in your comparison. |
i can't change the blocksize of input file .is possible solve with any workaround? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dneufarth
Active User
Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 419
Location: Inside the SPEW (Southwest Ohio, USA)
|
|
|
|
Change block size using SORT COPY to match other file creating a temp dataset and then run match using the same block size datasets.
That is a workaround. Not sure what else is available in IEBCOMPR.
Is SUPERC suggestion by Prino not doable?
What's next once you detect mismatches? Finding reason for mismatched data by looking through the hex results is tedious if there are many mismatches. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
imagines
New User
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Location: Italy
|
|
|
|
| prino wrote: |
Suggestion? Add
to your SuperC control statements. And run SuperC in batch! |
i need to have max speed performance of superc
is correct this ? is possible to optimize ?
| Code: |
/COMPARE1 EXEC PGM=ISRSUPC,
// PARM=(DELTAL,LINECMP,EMPTYOK,'','',)
//NEWDD DD DSN=xxxxxx.xx.xxx.,DISP=SHR
//OLDDD DD DSN=xx.xxx.xxx.xxxxx,DISP=SHR
//OUTDD DD DSN=xxxxxx.xx.xx.TEMP.COMPARE,
// DISP=(NEW,CATLG,CATLG),
// DCB=SYS2.FB,SPACE=(CYL,(60,60),RLSE)
//SYSIN DD *
WORKSIZE 524288
//* |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
imagines
New User
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Location: Italy
|
|
|
|
| Sorry i want only to compare. How can i configure superc batch? Thank you in Advance |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
use the superc / superc extended dialogs
choose to run in batch and save the jcl ISPF has built for You |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
imagines
New User
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Location: Italy
|
|
|
|
| Enrico i need to optimize it. Standard configuration IS too slowly for My file |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| How can i configure superc batch? |
use the PF1 key, or read the manual |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
