|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
RickBig
New User
Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Posts: 10
Location: Canada
|
|
|
|
We have just upgraded to V2.2 and my TASID has broken a little bit. I have V5.21, which I believe is the latest.
What's broken is the imitator status list - when I try that now, I get 'unsupported level' (I guess referring to V2.2), and PF1 gives 'TASID could not find the PIT control block'.
Any ideas? Is there a new TASID around I can't find?
BTW if this isn't the correct support group please redirect me.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10886
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
| most probably the best source of info would be IBM itself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickBig
New User
Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Posts: 10
Location: Canada
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I have emailed the SPF support group, but I thought I might get a quicker reply here.
And hopefully that reply won't be 'Sorry, but we have stopped support TASID with ZOS 2.2'! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8700
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
| The TASID web site says it supports z/OS 2.2. But then, it also says that TASID is not a supported IBM product and you use it at your own risk, so you may get a "Sorry" response anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickBig
New User
Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Posts: 10
Location: Canada
|
|
|
|
I'm kind of surprised IBM would claim TASID V5.21 supports Z/OS 2.2 since 2.2 was released AFTER V5.12!
| Code: |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SMS is available with PDSE support. |
| TASID 5.21 - Compiled at 12.37 on 2013/06/21 |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Copyright IBM Corp, 1993, 2013. |
[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Akatsukami
Global Moderator
Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 1787
Location: Bloomington, IL
|
|
|
|
| Wasn't TASID freeware written by Doug Nadel, that IBM ceased to update when he retired? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickBig
New User
Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Posts: 10
Location: Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickBig
New User
Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Posts: 10
Location: Canada
|
|
|
|
So I did, finally, receive a reply from IBM ISPF. They reminded me that TASID is provided on an 'as-is' basis, and they couldn't provide me with a timeline for a fix.
when I mentioned that the webpage indicates support for Z/OS 2.2, they said they would update that, which they did, along with highlighting the 'AS-IS' basis of the product.
So I'm not optimistic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prino
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 1314
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
|
|
|
|
| RickBig wrote: |
So I did, finally, receive a reply from IBM ISPF. They reminded me that TASID is provided on an 'as-is' basis, and they couldn't provide me with a timeline for a fix.
when I mentioned that the webpage indicates support for Z/OS 2.2, they said they would update that, which they did, along with highlighting the 'AS-IS' basis of the product.
So I'm not optimistic. |
RFE time! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vladimir Mironov
New User
Joined: 17 Nov 2016
Posts: 2
Location: Canada
|
|
|
|
| Code: |
NAME TASID TASIDPIT
VER 82 911024F5
REP 82 914024F6
REP 86 A7840006
REP 8A A74801B8
REP 8E A7F4003C
REP 92 A74801B0
REP 96 A7F40038
REP 9A 07000700
REP 9E 07000700
REP A2 07000700
REP A6 0700
REP A8 07000700
REP AC 07000700
REP B0 07000700
REP B4 07000700
REP B8 07000700
REP BC 07000700
REP C0 07000700
REP C4 07000700
REP C8 07000700
REP CC 07000700
REP D0 07000700
REP D4 07000700
REP D8 07000700
REP DC 07000700
REP E0 07000700
REP E4 07000700
REP E8 07000700
REP EC 07000700
REP F0 07000700
REP F4 07000700
REP F8 07000700
REP FC 07000700
REP 0100 07000700
REP 0104 0700
|
Please let me know if this fix "option" 4 problem. Thank you.
Regards,
Vladimir Mironov,
Ottawa, Canada |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickBig
New User
Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Posts: 10
Location: Canada
|
|
|
|
| Thanks, Vladimir. I guess it's been over a year since your post, but I have applied your superzap patch to my version of TASID - and it does seems to have worked. Funny that IBM can't do the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vladimir Mironov
New User
Joined: 17 Nov 2016
Posts: 2
Location: Canada
|
|
|
|
Happy that this works for you.
Thank you for letting me know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hankoerlemans
New User
Joined: 25 Jan 2018
Posts: 61
Location: Australia
|
|
|
|
Forget TASID.
I used to look after it post-Doug just to keep things ticking along for all the loyal customers out there. IBM will not supply any resources for TASID as there is no pay back. IMO
SDSF looks pretty good. Better off putting an RFE against it to supply the TASID nice bits that you need/want. At least there is a revenue correlation back to the requirement.
Cheers Hank, no-longer-at-IBM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickBig
New User
Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Posts: 10
Location: Canada
|
|
|
|
Hi Hank - I believe you made a patch for me quite a while ago, after a ZOS update broke TASID!  Or maybe it was the other way around..
I'm retiring shortly - so TASID ID as it works now (with Vladimir's patch to fix the initiator display) is as far as I need to go! There's an existing minor bug - the initiator screen doesn't show the job class on the far right column - but I can manage!
Many thanks for keeping TASID alive this long!
Regards,
Rick Bigelow |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
