|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
gauravuppal
New User
Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 2
Location: Noida
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a query looking for some answers.
We are trying to put a bunch of ( 100's of jobs ) jobs in CA7 in production.
We want to test those jobs in CA7 just the jcl errors and their dependencies but dont want to execute them so that we dont process any production data.
we were thinking of putting typrun=scan but that is not posting the next job in ca7
if we put a typrun=hold it will execute the steps inside the jcl
is there any solution we can try to test the dependencies among all the jobs and also do jclscan on them.
any help will be greatly appreciated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I all of the jobs have been run successfully standalone, what problem do you have running them thru the scheduler?
If you have datasets that are created in one process and used in an other, I don't see how you can "test" this without running the process to create these datasets . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sureshpathi10
Active User
Joined: 03 May 2010
Posts: 154
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
|
|
|
Hi,
You may try to use COND parameter to bypass all the steps.
COND=(0,LE) in the JOB statement. I'm not CA7 expert but just thought this might work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nic Clouston
Global Moderator
Joined: 10 May 2007
Posts: 2455
Location: Hampshire, UK
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| You may try to use COND parameter to bypass all the steps |
Yes, but no. You have to remove the COND again so you have now changed the run deck so it has to be tested again! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
