IBM Mainframe Forum Index
 
Log In
 
IBM Mainframe Forum Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Register
 

CEE3204S The system detected a protection exception


IBM Mainframe Forums -> ABENDS & Debugging
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dsingh29

Active User


Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Posts: 132
Location: IBM

PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:00 pm
Reply with quote

hi All,

I am facing a weird problem.

I changed two programs, which in production, are run using CAF (call attach facility).

One of the program is abending with SOC4 with error message "CEE3204S The system detected a protection exception (System Completion Code=0C4)". This problem occurs when we run it via JCL and proc (pgm is run with CAF in proc), but I am not facing this issue when the whole of Proc is copied in JCL.

Other program is running fine in JCL and proc setting.

Can anybody please help. My program has internal table and language is cobol. Please let me know if you need more information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Woodger

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 09 Mar 2011
Posts: 7310
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:44 pm
Reply with quote

If you have something which didn't abend before, then you make a change, and it abends, it is somehting to do with the change :-)

Have you located where it abends?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dsingh29

Active User


Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Posts: 132
Location: IBM

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:27 pm
Reply with quote

Hi Bill,

I would like emphasis that, program is running fine in test region and in production when run through JCL (all the proc statmenets are copied in JCL). Abend occurs only when we try to run it via proc, I smell something fishy the way its called in proc. i.e. CAF. We use Endevor for Version controlling.

Any pointers would be helpful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enrico-sorichetti

Superior Member


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10796
Location: italy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:31 pm
Reply with quote

well...
did You care to look at the expanded jcl when using the PROC and note the differences from corresponding one using the inlined jcl statements ???

most probably some unwanted library got in the way because of some unnoticed PROC parm !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19245
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:05 pm
Reply with quote

Hello,

As Bill mentioned before - what was changed (intentionally or un-intentionally)?

Do as Enrico suggests and review the expanded JCL.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic View Bookmarks
All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Forum Index -> ABENDS & Debugging

 


Similar Topics
Topic Forum Replies
No new posts Is the Output of Sort/Join dependent ... DFSORT/ICETOOL 2
No new posts non-system user tasks in CICS CICS 1
No new posts z/VM system programmers Mainframe Jobs 0
No new posts Exception Filter CA Products 0
No new posts Looking for mainframe system programmers Mainframe Jobs 0
Search our Forums:

Back to Top