IBM Mainframe Forum Index
 
Log In
 
IBM Mainframe Forum Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Register
 

Xpediter Error - INVALID XPEDITER SVC NUMBER (250)


IBM Mainframe Forums -> IBM Tools
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
deb_parthas

New User


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:20 pm
Reply with quote

Hi All,
I am facing an error after I recompile a program and put it into xpediter. The error details are below. Kindly let me know if you are aware of the solution?

XPED TSO SPF
TEST XFUL710
LOADM XFUL710
DB2 YES
DB2SYS ADG0
PARM 'TESTYFULL'
XPD1110 ADSRA111 INVALID XPEDITER SVC NUMBER (250)
*** XFUL710 FROM ANTLIB.NM.S1D.PGMLIB LINK 02/24/12
XPD2215 ADSRA221 LANGUAGE ENVIRONMENT SUPPORT NOT ESTABLISHED (RC=00004040).
IF TESTING AN LE APPLICATION, THE LE RUNTIME LIBRARY SHOULD BE
INCLUDED IN THE SETUP.
XPD4210 ADSRA194 A LANGUAGE PROCESSOR INCOMPATABILITY HAS OCCURRED.
XPD4211 ADSRA194 LANGUAGE PROCESSOR RELEASE USED TO COMPILE = 08.08.00
XPD4212 ADSRA194 LANGUAGE PROCESSOR RELEASE USED TO EXECUTE = 08.07.00
NO SOURCE LISTING INFORMATION FOUND FOR MODULE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterHolland

Global Moderator


Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2481
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:34 pm
Reply with quote

here is the solution :

XPD2215 ADSRA221 LANGUAGE ENVIRONMENT SUPPORT NOT ESTABLISHED (RC=00004040).
IF TESTING AN LE APPLICATION, THE LE RUNTIME LIBRARY SHOULD BE
INCLUDED IN THE SETUP.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbzTHEdinosauer

Global Moderator


Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:38 pm
Reply with quote

there is a panel for user libraries.

suggest you go there and insure that all libraries are included.
sorta like when the program is executed in batch,
the jcl allocats db2 libraries, cobol run libraries, and apparently some le libraries.

why did you feel it necessary to say that after compile, you have a problem testing.

does that mean that you previously tested this program and everything was ok?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deb_parthas

New User


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:48 pm
Reply with quote

Hi Dick,
We are using the LoadLibs and some installation libraries in the Xpediter setup. The installation Libs are below. The xpediter debugging process was working fine earlier. But after we compiled again, it started to show this error which makes me think that it is related to a step in the compilation process. But not sure exactly what changed and if any additional system library need to be added to the below list which may relate to the processor group etc.

'SYS1.SCEERUN'
'AATLIB.NM.TESTDB.SIDLIB'
'B0SADG0.ADG0.SDSNLOAD'
'C000.B0SORA.NM.V817.CMDLOAD'
'B0SORA.NM.V817.CMDLOAD'
'B0SORA.NM.V817.CMDLOAD.SQLDRV'
'B0SORA.NM.V817.SQLLIB'

Thanks,
Partha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enrico-sorichetti

Superior Member


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10888
Location: italy

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:51 pm
Reply with quote

the best place to start investigating is Your support, they should know what has changed!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbzTHEdinosauer

Global Moderator


Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:22 pm
Reply with quote

seems to me, a way to isolate the problem,
is after asking your support people when they changed anything,
i pick a module that was compiled before the change and see if it works.

and again, you need to insure that all libraries that are allocated for a successful batch run,
are allocated for xpediter.

and as far as your guess 'something changed in the compilation process'.

doubt it, especially considering the error. you are missing a library.
it could be due to a change in you code,
something that you have added requires something to support it.
in this case, a CALL to an LE routine.

and you still have not indicated if you can run the current module in batch.
you would not be testing the correctness of your changes,
BUT IF YOU HAVE ALL THE REQUIRED LIBRARIES ALLOCATED
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deb_parthas

New User


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:37 pm
Reply with quote

Thanks for the replies.
I am executing the program in batch. When I submit the JCL, it runs successfully while in Xpediter it is not able to enter the code.
Also, there has not been any changes in the code from last successful test run.
As indicated, most likely its missing a system library which will probably need consultation with the support team.

Thanks,
Partha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbzTHEdinosauer

Global Moderator


Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:48 pm
Reply with quote

now we are in over my head.
someone else will have to answer this.

but it is to me, inconceivable that one of the system libraries that are automatically allocated,
by that i mean that there is no JOBLIB or STEPLIB statement necessary for a batch job,
would not be automatically allocated to a TSO session.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deb_parthas

New User


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 4:51 pm
Reply with quote

OK. It looks like the Expediter listing or the DDIO file(AATLIB.VO.XPEDITER.LISTING) is full. I did a FileAid and it showed 100% track utilization. Should be the reason behind which will need the mainframe system admin to look into.

Dick, Regarding the joblib, we have included all in Xped LOADLIBs in order as same in the batch JCL.

thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbzTHEdinosauer

Global Moderator


Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 5:36 pm
Reply with quote

Deb,

in xpediter, go to the 5.3 option, S before your ddio file
and delete previous versions and other unnecessary garbage that
has accumulated.

as far as the fileaid 100percent utilitzation, it will always be 100,
that is the way the ddio file works.

it is not the cause of your problem.
if it was too full, then the generation of the listing during compilation
would fail.

had your listing not been a match with your load module,
you would have received an error stipulating a miss-match (actually, a no match)

sorry, your problem is and will be (until you solve it)
a missing load library of some kind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robert Sample

Global Moderator


Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8700
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 5:46 pm
Reply with quote

Quote:
XPD1110 ADSRA111 INVALID XPEDITER SVC NUMBER (250)
This means someone at your site did not set up Xpediter correctly. Xpediter is expecting to use SVC number 250 and either SVC 250 does not exist or it is being used by another software product. Neither of these is a good thing.

Quote:
I did a FileAid and it showed 100% track utilization.
Are you aware that Compuware Shared Services (CSS) initializes a DDIO when the DDIO is set up so it will ALWAYS show 100% allocated? You use a utility from Compuware called CWDDSUTL to check a DDIO file -- CWDDSUTL produces a report on the DDIO utilization. Check the Compuware Sahred Services User Reference Guide manual for more information.

The SVC error, however, makes me think you need to work with your site support group to identify and resolve the issue since set up problems can manifest in ways that are not always obvious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Woodger

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 09 Mar 2011
Posts: 7309
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:35 pm
Reply with quote

Did you take any notice of Peter's posting? Did you google for RC=00004040?

What language are you using?

Is there a possibility that your Xped is accessing some "old" LE libraries, which may account for the 08.08.00 vs 08.07.00?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic View Bookmarks
All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Forum Index -> IBM Tools

 


Similar Topics
Topic Forum Replies
No new posts IEW2315E 1369 Link error All Other Mainframe Topics 3
No new posts Help on IMS -API URL migrating from P... IMS DB/DC 1
No new posts JES datasets IO Error ABENDS & Debugging 3
No new posts Error to invoke MPP program through B... IMS DB/DC 3
No new posts PKZIP error ZPFM121E and ZPCE009E JCL & VSAM 6
Search our Forums:

Back to Top