|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Kumaresan.nk
New User
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 31
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a requirement. I have to send mail to multiple people but neither of them should know that others have been copied in that mail. Each receiver should have their name displayed in the 'TO' tab and should not know who else have been copied in that same mail. If we use 'BCC' option then, even the reciever's name wouldn't be displayed in the mail. I need the reciever's name to be displayed in the 'TO' field.
Can anyone help me, plz ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PeterHolland
Global Moderator
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2481
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen
|
|
|
|
| A wild guess, the receiver is also in the BCC list? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8796
Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
Ok, I'll fall for it. What on earth is the reason for this super secret mailing list ?
Is it a fully documented business requirement or just the whim of the current "Idiot of the day" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6248
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Do you use XMITIP? If yes, something like this will work:
| Code: |
//SYSTSIN DD *
%XMITIP (<ANUJ.DHAWAN@some.COM>) -
BCC (<some.one@some.COM>) -
FROM ("ANUJ DHAWAN"<ANUJ.DHAWAN@some.COM>) -
FILEDD EMFILE FORMAT TXT/L/9 -
FILENAME file name-
SUBJECT 'subject' |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6248
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PeterHolland
Global Moderator
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2481
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen
|
|
|
|
Anuj,
the TS is missing the TO addressee in his sent mail.
In your example i also dont see a TO addressee, hence my first post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6248
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Peter,
This job will send the atachment to Anuj in ""TO" and "some" in BCC. (SOME.XMITIP.REXX.EXEC is used for XMITIP )
| Code: |
//SENDMSG EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//*-------------------------------------------------------
//SYSEXEC DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SOME.XMITIP.REXX.EXEC
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//EMFILE DD DISP=SHR,DSN=attachement
//SYSTSIN DD *
%XMITIP (<ANUJ.DHAWAN@SOME.COM>) -
BCC (<SOME.ONE@SOME.COM>) -
FROM ("ANUJ DHAWAN"<ANUJ.DHAWAN@SOME.COM>) -
FILEDD EMFILE FORMAT TXT/L/9 -
FILENAME filename -
SUBJECT 'subject'
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=* |
Parameters in SYSTIN will be converted to:
| Code: |
XMITIP: XMITIP Application level: 5.54
XMITIP:
XMITIP:
XMITIP: XMITIP is freeware rather than a vendor supplied package. Thus there
XMITIP: is no formal support available.
XMITIP:
XMITIP: Message Addressing Information:
XMITIP: From: ANUJ.DHAWAN@SOME.COM
XMITIP: To: ANUJ.DHAWAN@SOME.COM
XMITIP: Bcc: SOME.ONE@SOME.COM
XMITIP:
XMITIP: The Mail Envelope:
XMITIP: Sender: ANUJ DHAWAN <ANUJ.DHAWAN@SOME.COM>
XMITIP: Date: 20 Oct 2010 07:36:36 -0400
XMITIP: From: "ANUJ DHAWAN" <ANUJ.DHAWAN@SOME.COM>
XMITIP: To: ANUJ.DHAWAN@SOME.COM
XMITIP: Subject: Subject |
Hope this helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PeterHolland
Global Moderator
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2481
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen
|
|
|
|
Anuj,
i stand corrected. Thanks for the lesson. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6248
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Peter - I got your concern now, yes you're correct.
Lesson? Please stop it...you make me blush  ....
Regards,  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Not very elegant, but one way to do this is to simply send the e-mail n times - to one recipient each time. . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dbzTHEdinosauer
Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
the whim of the current "Idiot of the day"
|
following up on this thought:
when one receives an email that was sent as BCC,
one knows that they have received a 'secret' message,
and handles the info accordingly.
otherwise, why use the BCC?
this is a real idiot problem.
because of the requirement, the normal distribution list 'utility' can not be used.
only solution is separate emails.
load the system with extra garbage
because some manager wants to exert authority.
i'd tell him to ****-off (you can interpret that fluidly or functionally) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kumaresan.nk
New User
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 31
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Hi,
The scenario is to send everyone a link to access to know about thier insurance details. I guess sending n times would be the right option. Thanks for all your help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phrzby Phil
Senior Member
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 1050
Location: Richmond, Virginia
|
|
|
|
So each e-mail is actually different, specific to each recipient?
If so, then they obviously each need a separate e-mail.
If not, then what's wrong with BCC?
Before you clarify how to do something, you must clarify what you want to do.
Then, and this is important, have your manager/colleagues confirm, each agreeing in writing to the same specs, and if you are lucky, each agreeing on consecutive days to the same specs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
