View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
dilipbiradar
New User
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 18 Location: Pune (India)
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am facing the S222 abend in very huge program. The TS team said that they have had a looping also, they have mentioned account number to be removed from the file in order to avoid the looping and ran the job second time which went fine.
When I ran a stand alone set up with the back up file, it runs smooth.
What would be the possible cause??? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10886 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
did You care to look at the manual for the meaning of the s222 abend
I did it for You
Quote: |
222
Explanation: The operator, or an authorized time sharing option extensions (TSO/E) user, canceled the job without requesting a dump.
Source: Master scheduler
System Action: The system ends the job. In some cases, the system might write a dump even though a dump was not requested, depending on which system routine has control.
Programmer Response: Find out why the operator or TSO/E user canceled the job. Correct any errors and resubmit the job. If you want a dump, have the operator resubmit the job and then cancel it using the command CANCEL jobname, DUMP. |
nothing we can do from here, follow the advice given in the manual |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6248 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dilipbiradar
New User
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 18 Location: Pune (India)
|
|
|
|
According to the tester/TS team member, the job went in loop (And they might have requested the CANCEL JOB to Operator, but I am not sure) The thing which I want to know here is why the same job is not going in loop when I am doing the stand alone testing? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10886 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
If You trust more Your TS team, why ask a forum
everything You said is just pure speculation...
You got an S222 abend??
it means that the operator or an authorized TSO user canceled the job full stop
the reason why in the test environment the job executed successfully could be basically...
for the loop theory - difference in the data processed
for a non loop theory -difference in the data volume being processed
( the huge amount of data made the program appear to be looping ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dilipbiradar
New User
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 18 Location: Pune (India)
|
|
|
|
Why you are so angry sir? I am a new chap in this field. Please forgive me !! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10886 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
I am not angry I am just trying to make You understand what is going on?
a program got canceled by the operator
ask the operator why he/she took that decision
debugging can be carried on only with a methodology, not listening to rumors,
he said that he heard that somebody had possibly done ...
for example "removing account number" from where ?? jcl??
submitted to a different class, maybe ??
different job classes might be granted different time limits,
but then You wouldn' t have gotten a s222 but a s322
what kind of loop...
strict ( no i/o involved )
... memory corruption for array limits
wide ( i/o involved )
more difficult to debug, ( cpu is used, I/O is done, same behavior as when processing lots of data )
again investigate how the data being processed differs in the different environments |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dilipbiradar
New User
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 18 Location: Pune (India)
|
|
|
|
Just thought of asking you what is RTFM and STFW ?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008 Posts: 8700 Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
Google is your friend -- both terms are easily found in Google. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6248 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Read The Fine Manual", "Read The Friendly Manual", "Read The Full Manual", or "Read The Field Manual" -- if this abbreviation has other meanings... I dont' know them . . . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aaru
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2007 Posts: 1287 Location: Chennai, India
|
|
|
|
RTFM - Refer the forum manuals
STFW - Search the forum well
This is again my guess ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10886 Location: italy
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|