|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
JayC
New User
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 70
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Has anyone come across the following message :
| Code: |
IOS050I CHANNEL DETECTED ERROR ON 7F59,FE,01,**02,PCHID=01B3
|
My job has been running for the last 16 hours and this is a particular message in the spool that seems to be standing out, I haven't seen it before.
Any ideas ? Pointers ? experience with such a case ?
I believe its a hardware problem.
Any help with be much appreciated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10884
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
why don' t You ask Your support, or look at the manual Yourself
we cannot fix Your hardware from here |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jaytc911
Currently Banned
New User
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 1
|
|
|
|
I didn't ask you to fix my hardware... all I asked for was if there is anyone out there whose seen this before and who has any information regarding the same.
Before I posted this here...
I did ask our support- they don't have much of an answer...
I googled this on the net--but didn't get anything useful....
I thought members of this forum are suppose to follow a verbal decorum... Kindly be more polite in your replies....
People come/join/use this forum because they need help with something...You ask for help when you know your technically weak or short on experience.
Just because you know more or are more experienced doesn't give you the right to be rude to others... 
Note from the Chief: Please respect our Moderators, they are spending their valuable time on your problems without any returns - or - Get Banned!. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8796
Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
jayct911 / jayc
jayct911 banned as this is a second logon id
Following your little speech above, please point out exactly where in your original post you clearly specified that you had taken the actions you mentioned in the second post.
Unless you state exactly what you have done how can we not help feel that you are being lazy and have not done the things that you state that you have done.
Please bear this in mind for future posts. And this goes for anyone else who wishes to post on the forum, Let others know what you have already done to help reduce duplicate wasted effort - or of course - not to receive replies that are not entirely to your own liking |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nevilh
Active User
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Posts: 262
|
|
|
|
| It is probably a hardware error try taking a look in the LOGREC data it should give a clue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JayC
New User
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 70
|
|
|
|
Expat,
I hold the utmost respect for the moderator in this forum - they are spending time to solve our problems... But respect is give and take... not a one way road.
Just because I didn't crowd my post with what I had done before I posted my query - Should you jump to the conclusions ? ? ? ... Not all the members of this forum are Lazy. . .
All I asked for was a bit more courtesy/politeness... thats all...
The reply is definately not to my liking... anyone who reads the post and has half a mind will understand that....
Thanks nevilh.. will check the LOGREC data...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8700
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
The manual says
| Quote: |
System Action: The system writes a logrec data set error record.
Operator Response: Do the following:
1. Isolate the failing storage director, control unit, or channel path for repair.
2. If the error persists on one path to the device, and the system has another path to the device, vary offline the path with the error.
3. If the job that allocated the device is running in the master's address space, force the device offline, then cancel any jobs that allocated the device.
If the job that allocated the device is not running in the master's address space, cancel any jobs that allocated the device, then force the device offline. |
There's no programmer response listed -- which implies there's nothing the programmer can do about this error. The job may have run so long because the physical device failure kept the data from being read. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JayC
New User
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 70
|
|
|
|
Thanks Robert for the information....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
