|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
jain.eti
New User
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
Title edited/corrected
Hi,
I am trying to REPRO a tape file to DASD using IDCAMS. I used the below JCL -
| Code: |
//M4443ETI JOB (N400),'AMIT-ETI',CLASS=K,
// MSGCLASS=P,COND=(0,LT),
// REGION=0K,
// NOTIFY=&SYSUID
//*=====================================================================
//***
//TODISK EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//***
//*=====================================================================
//***
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
//***
//INFILE DD DSN=SYS3.QPP1D.ARCH.D08119.T105510.F01,
// DISP=SHR,
// UNIT=3490,VOLUME=(,RETAIN,,,SER=(444392)),
// LABEL=(727,SL),
// RECFM=VBA,LRECL=240,BLKSIZE=32760
//***
//OUTFILE DD DSN=&&ARCHDISP,
//* RECFM=VBA,LRECL=240,BLKSIZE=32760
// DISP=(NEW,PASS,DELETE),
// UNIT=TEMPDA,
// SPACE=(CYL,(100,5),RLSE),
// RECFM=VBA,LRECL=240,BLKSIZE=32760
//***
//SYSIN DD *
REPRO INFILE(INFILE) OUTFILE(OUTFILE)
//***
//*===================================================================== |
But I am getting a return code of 12. I am attaching the SYSPRINT here -
| Code: |
IDCAMS SYSTEM SERVICES TIME: 12:51:27
REPRO INFILE(INFILE) OUTFILE(OUTFILE)
IDC3300I ERROR OPENING SYS3.QPP1D.ARCH.D08119.T105510.F01
IDC3321I ** OPEN/CLOSE/EOV ABEND EXIT TAKEN
IDC0005I NUMBER OF RECORDS PROCESSED WAS 0
IDC3003I FUNCTION TERMINATED. CONDITION CODE IS 12
IDC0002I IDCAMS PROCESSING COMPLETE. MAXIMUM CONDITION CODE WAS 12 |
Any idea why this problem occured? But I used the same JCL to REPRO some other tape files to DASD and they went fine. What's the problem with this JCL? Guys, any idea? I badly need ur suggestions ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8700
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
| What's the error message(s) in the job output? Having some idea of what the system thinks the error is can be quite useful in resolving the problem, actually. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jain.eti
New User
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
Robert,
What do you mean by error messages? I already attached the SYSPRINT of TODISK step. However now I am attaching the step description in JESYSMSG -
| Code: |
IEF373I STEP/TODISK /START 2008316.1251
IEF374I STEP/TODISK /STOP 2008316.1308 CPU 0MIN 00.27SEC SRB 0MIN 00.07S
IEF237I 5D54 ALLOCATED TO SYS00001
IEF285I SYS08316.T130825.RA000.M4443ETI.R0131346 KEPT
IEF285I VOL SER NOS= 1DW005.
IGD105I SYS08316.T125127.RA000.M4443ETI.ARCHDISP.H01 DELETED, DDNAME=OUTFILE
IEF201I M4443ETI TODISK - JOB TERMINATED BECAUSE OF CONDITION CODES |
But all these statements are informative. These informations are not indicating any error!
Wish to hear from u ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8700
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
| There's usually something in the JES messages about why the dataset cannot be opened. I suspect there's something in your case as I see the message about DDNAME=OUTFILE being deleted, but where's a message about DDNAME=INFILE? And why are you getting a dynamically allocated file SYS00001? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jain.eti
New User
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
Robert, refer the JES message in details -
| Code: |
ICH70001I PSCZEXJ LAST ACCESS AT 12:51:27 ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008
IEF236I ALLOC. FOR M4443ETI TODISK
IEF237I JES2 ALLOCATED TO SYSPRINT
IEF237I JES2 ALLOCATED TO SYSUDUMP
IEF237I 05C6 ALLOCATED TO INFILE
IGD101I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME (OUTFILE )
DSN (SYS08316.T132323.RA000.M4443ETI.ARCHDISP.H01)
STORCLAS (SCWORK01) MGMTCLAS ( ) DATACLAS ( )
VOL SER NOS= 1DW001
IEF237I JES2 ALLOCATED TO SYSIN
IEC149I 813-04,IFG0195H,M4443ETI,TODISK,INFILE,05C6,444392,SYS3.QPP1D.ARCH.D0811
IEC141I 013-34,IGG0191I,M4443ETI,TODISK,OUTFILE,5D50,1DW001,SYS08316.T132323.RA0
IEF142I M4443ETI TODISK - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 0012
IEF285I PSCZEXJ.M4443ETI.JOB31468.D0000102.? SYSOUT
IEF285I PSCZEXJ.M4443ETI.JOB31468.D0000103.? SYSOUT
IEF285I SYS3.QPP1D.ARCH.D08119.T105510.F01 KEPT
IEF285I VOL SER NOS= 444392.
IEF285I PSCZEXJ.M4443ETI.JOB31468.D0000101.? SYSIN
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* P E R O T S Y S T E M S
* S T E P R E P O R T
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* CONDITION STEP PRIVATE SCRATCH I/O CONN
* JOBSTEP PROCSTEP CODE RUN TIME MOUNTS MOUNTS TIME
*
* TODISK R0012 00:32:28.84 1 0 00:00:12
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* VOLUME DDNAME I/O TIME EXCP COUNT VOLUME DDNAME I/O TIME EXCP
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IEF373I STEP/TODISK /START 2008316.1323
IEF373I STEP/TODISK /START 2008316.1323
IEF374I STEP/TODISK /STOP 2008316.1355 CPU 0MIN 00.24SEC SRB 0MIN 00.07
IEF237I 5D50 ALLOCATED TO SYS00001
IEF285I SYS08316.T135552.RA000.M4443ETI.R0131398 KEPT
IEF285I VOL SER NOS= 1DW001.
IGD105I SYS08316.T132323.RA000.M4443ETI.ARCHDISP.H01 DELETED, DDNAME=OUTFILE
IEF201I M4443ETI TODISK - JOB TERMINATED BECAUSE OF CONDITION CODES
*------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* P E R O T S Y S T E M S
* J O B R E P O R T
*------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* CONDITION JOB PRIVATE SCRATCH I/O CON
* JOBNAME DATE CODE RUN TIME MOUNTS MOUNTS TIME
*
* M4443ETI 11/11/08 R0012 00:32:28.97 1 0 00:00:1
*------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
IEF375I JOB/M4443ETI/START 2008316.1323
IEF376I JOB/M4443ETI/STOP 2008316.1355 CPU 0MIN 00.24SEC SRB 0MIN 00.07 |
Please refer the JES message above? Actually this is the part of our impacted job. This step is creating the problem and that's why I was trying to run that particular step and thats why this particular output file is temporary ...
Got me, Robert? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10886
Location: italy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8700
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
This is a lot more informative. Error messages from the system are very good at telling you what the problem could be.
This message
| Code: |
| IEC149I 813-04,IFG0195H,M4443ETI,TODISK,INFILE,05C6,444392,SYS3.QPP1D.ARCH.D0811 |
says that the dataset name on the tape label does not match the name in your JCL for INFILE. Can you run a tape map or similar utility to find out the actual tape dataset name?
This message
| Code: |
| IEC141I 013-34,IGG0191I,M4443ETI,TODISK,OUTFILE,5D50,1DW001,SYS08316.T132323.RA0 |
has a bit longer possible list of causes:
| Quote: |
34
The system detected one of these conditions:
* The following combination was specified: QSAM, MACRF=GD or PD, and a RECFM value that is not VS, VBS, DS, or DBS.
* An OPEN macro instruction was issued for a data set with BLKSIZE and BUFL equal to 0. The system determined that it had to obtain buffers but was unable to do so.
* RECFM was specified with both the A and M attributes.
* The following combination was specified: QSAM, LRECL=0, and a RECFM value that is not V or VB.
* The following combination was specified: RECFM=V or VB and LRECL greater than the quantity BLKSIZE minus 4.
* The following combination was specified: QSAM and BLKSIZE=0. No nonzero BLKSIZE value was available from any source and the system could not determine one. Coding BLKSIZE=0 in the JCL never has an effect except when overriding a cataloged procedure variable.
* The following combination was specified: RECFM not variable or undefined and LRECL greater than BLKSIZE.
* The following combination was specified: BFTEK=A, RECFM=VBS, and LRECL=0. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
It sounds like the 727 is incorrect . . .
Which tape management system is used on your system? If you talk with your tape storage management people, they can tell you all of the files on this multi-file volume.
DISP=SHR should not be used for tape/cart. . .
You need to fix the problem with INFILE before you concern yourself with OUTFILE. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aaru
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 1287
Location: Chennai, India
|
|
|
|
Jain,
If you are still facing problems, Why don't you try using IEBGENER for copying datasets from TAPE to DASD. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
If file #727 on the tape is not the one named in the dsn, it will not matter which utility is used. The abend will still occur.
The first task is to ensure the jcl and the file spacify the same dsn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aaru
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 1287
Location: Chennai, India
|
|
|
|
Dick,
| Quote: |
| The first task is to ensure the jcl and the file spacify the same dsn. |
Very True.
I had posted as I had used ONLY IEBGENER for such requirements. Anyways I should have had a look at the actual issue  . Sorry for that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hi Aaru,
Not to worry - the "post police" are watching  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jain.eti
New User
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
Thank you Robert and Enrico! It was new to me. Thanks once again ... I learnt a new thing  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
| Quote: |
| I learnt a new thing |
Good to hear
Is the abend resolved and the job successfully run? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jain.eti
New User
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
Oops! I did not see the last posts in this sections. I was aware of Enrico and Robert's reply only! However, Dick I am trying to confirm what I understood from ur post -
| Quote: |
It sounds like the 727 is incorrect . . .
Which tape management system is used on your system? If you talk with your tape storage management people, they can tell you all of the files on this multi-file volume.
DISP=SHR should not be used for tape/cart. . . |
According to u, I should have to understand whether the INFILE is present in the correct label i.e. 727 in the tape. Am I right? OK! We have received a dump with informtaion of tape files, VOL-SER and labels within a particular date-range. We are trying to FTP those files mentioned in the DISPATCH dump, to windows server. So in the DISPATCH dump, all the information regarding the files, its VOL-SER and label is mentioned.
I do not know which tape-management system is used! Is CA-1 a tape-management system? I do not have any idea ... 
Dick I am eager to listen from u .... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jain.eti
New User
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
By the way, that problem is not still solved and I am trying seach a needle in a dump of garbages ...  I do not have any idea about this problem ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
| Quote: |
| Is CA-1 a tape-management system? |
Yes, it is. If you talk with the tape storage management people they should be able to run a "grw" (generalized report writer - comes with CA-1) or an EARL (a better reporting tool [imho] that also comes with CA-1) report that will list all of the files on that volume and which file# each is.
That is probably a good place to start.
How did you come to know that #727 was this particular file? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jain.eti
New User
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
Yah! I looked into the dump (I mentioned in my earlier post) and it is pretty much confirmed that the label (727) is referring the same tape file. By the way, now we are getting a new error in JES -
| Code: |
IEF237I JES2 ALLOCATED TO SYSUDUMP
IEF237I 05C4 ALLOCATED TO INFILE
IGD101I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME (OUTFILE )
DSN (SYS08317.T122359.RA000.M445857H.ARCHDISP.H01)
STORCLAS (SCWORK01) MGMTCLAS ( ) DATACLAS ( )
VOL SER NOS= 1DW003
IEF237I JES2 ALLOCATED TO SYSIN
IEC030I B37-04,IFG0554A,M445857H,TODISK,OUTFILE,5D52,1DW003,SYS08317.T122359.RA0
IEF142I M445857H TODISK STEP070 - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 0012
IEF285I CA7STC.M445857H.JOB34827.D0000162.? SYSOUT
IEF285I CA7STC.M445857H.JOB34827.D0000163.? SYSOUT
IEF285I SYS3.QPP1D.ARCH.D08118.T112723.F01 KEPT
IEF285I VOL SER NOS= 445857.
IGD106I SYS08317.T122359.RA000.M445857H.ARCHDISP.H01 PASSED, DDNAME=OUTFILE
IEF285I CA7STC.M445857H.JOB34827.D0000102.? SYSIN |
Look now we are getting B37 (I believe, it is space abend). Is it not so?
But we modified our job with a larger space (for both primary and secondary) but with the same result. Dick, some other input? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8700
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
| You need to either give the file more space or possibly let it go to multiple volumes if it has used up an entire volume already. SB37 means there's no space left on the volume for a secondary extent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8700
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
| You mentioned a dump in an earlier post -- would that have record counts in it? If so, you can calculate how much space you need and ensure you've allocated enough space on disk for the file. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jain.eti
New User
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
Robert, I have not seen any field named record counts in the dump. But I have a field name File #. I believe, it is referring the label on a particular VOL-SER. Is it not so? I initially tried with output dataset with space (100,5), the job got abended with the same message as mentioned above. And then I tried with space for output file as (200,50) but still I am getting the same result.
And Robert, as u said in ur last post that we can find out the space required by record counts, what do u mean by that? Can u give little more explanation so that it will be easier for me to grasp... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8700
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
If you divide block size by (average) record length, you get the average number of records per block. Calculate the number of records per cylinder (records per block * 30 if half-track blocking, records per block * 15 if using > half track blocking), divide number of records in the file by records per cylinder to determine number of cylinders required.
Example: 27998 (half track block size) divided by 240 (LRECL from your earlier JCL) = 116 records (truncate anything after the decimal point) minimum per block, times 2 for full track times 15 for tracks per cylinder gives 3480 records per cylinder (minimum -- could be more if average LRECL is less than 240). If you have 500,000 records in the file, that's going to require 144 cylinders (round up) or less, depending on LRECL. At 32760 block size, the same file would require 246 cylinders.
File number would refer to the sequence number of the file on the tape.
Without the message from the system I'm flying blind here, but IF (and that's a big if) you're getting the full 16 extents on the pack you're using 200 + 15 * 50 = 950 cylinders and running out of space. It's also possible you used all free space on the pack and the system couldn't allocate another extent, so you might not have used all that space. If I thought the first case were true, I'd bump the allocation to (1000,200) assuming there's enough space on a pack. if I thought the second case were true, I'd probably try (500,500) to get a smaller primary but more secondary to increase the odds of getting the primary space allocation. I would also probably try to give it another pack or three to expand to should the first selected pack be very short on space. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
It will probably help if you post the OUTFILE dd statement that is abending.
How did you get around the s813 abend? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10886
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
please do not cheat 
now You are talking about a different issue because you
changed the input dataset name
anyway I have always advised against small secondary allocations
allocating lets say (200,20) is a nonsenss
it will simply make the allocation 2.5 times the original, with little room for contingencies
if You have to go for secondary allocations make them as big as the primary!
if You have a tape management system You should be abe to query the record/block count
and with a small effort determine the space needed on disk
or run a repro with a dummy output to get the count |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jain.eti
New User
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
Hey Enrico, I am not cheating at all! 
You hurt me! 
Hah! I really did not change the input file name. I am running several jobs per day to complete the work mentioned in my last posts. I have got abend (Sorry not abend but CC = 12) in 3 jobs. The last attached JES message shows those of these Job's JES.
On the other hand, I tried to run the REPRO step for each of these 3 jobs seperately and the message I got earlier was of my seperate run (Seperate run includes only one step to run REPRO). The first JES message attached here shows that of this job's JES message.
So got me now, Enrico?
Yop! Robert showed me how to look into job's description in JES in his 2nd or 3rd post I believe. It was new to me. I analyzed that way and found that orginally these 3 jobs were giving B37. So I attached JES message of those jobs because they refer the problem I am facing not the other one!
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I AM NOT CHEATING ....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
