|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Agni
New User
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I am trying to send mail from the mainframes. I have added the below step in my PROC.
| Code: |
//PS0350 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=A
//SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(B,SMTP)
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=USERID.OWN.PARMLIB(MAIL),DISP=SHR
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=I
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
|
And in my parm member, i am having the below.
| Code: |
MAIL FROM: <XXXXXXX@AAAA.COM>
RCPT TO: <XXXXXXX@AAAA.COM>
DATA
DATE: APR 04,2008
FROM: MY NAME <XXXXXXX@AAAA.COM>
TO: "YYYY" <YYYYYYYY@AAAA.COM>;"ZZZZ"
<ZZZZZ@AAAA>;
MY NAME <XXXXXXX@AAAA.COM>;
SUBJECT: TEST EMAIL
THIS IS A TEST MAIL SENT FROM MAINFRAMES TO THE MAIL ID.
|
When I execute the above step, the mail was not sent.
But when i had the above step in a separate PDS member, i was able to send mail to myself. But it didn't reach others. Please find the code for the same below.
| Code: |
//USERID JOB (0000),'SENDING MAIL',CLASS=0,MSGCLASS=U,
// NOTIFY=&SYSUID
//PROGRAM EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=A
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(B,SMTP)
//SYSUT1 DD *
MAIL FROM: <XXXXXXX@AAAA.COM>
RCPT TO: <XXXXXXX@AAAA.COM>
DATA
DATE: APR 04,2008
FROM: MY NAME <XXXXXXX@AAAA.COM>
TO: "YYYY" <YYYYYYYY@AAAA.COM>;"ZZZZ"
<ZZZZZ@AAAA>;
MY NAME <XXXXXXX@AAAA.COM>;
SUBJECT: TEST EMAIL
THIS IS A TEST MAIL SENT FROM MAINFRAMES TO THE MAIL ID.
.
/*
|
Please let me know if i need to change any thing else.
Note: Please note the difference between SYSUT1 and SYSIN in both the steps ( I did this change as //SYSUT1 DD * is not allowed inside a PROC)
Agni. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CICS Guy
Senior Member
Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Posts: 2146
Location: At my coffee table
|
|
|
|
| Does the "separate PDS member" work if you use "DSN=USERID.OWN.PARMLIB(MAIL)" instead of "*" for SYSUT1? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Agni
New User
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
| No, its not working. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CICS Guy
Senior Member
Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Posts: 2146
Location: At my coffee table
|
|
|
|
| Does the "separate PDS member" work if you use 80 byte unblocked flat file instead of "*" for SYSUT1? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Agni
New User
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Hi,
When i tried to allocate the unblocked dataset, i was not able to open the dataset.
| Code: |
Allocate New Data Set
Command ===>
More: +
Data Set Name . . . : USERID.MAIL.FLATFILE
Management class . . . DEV1000 (Blank for default management class)
Storage class . . . . DEV1000 (Blank for default storage class)
Volume serial . . . . 1MDS27 (Blank for system default volume) **
Device type . . . . . (Generic unit or device address) **
Data class . . . . . . ADDDSORG (Blank for default data class)
Space units . . . . . TRACK (BLKS, TRKS, CYLS, KB, MB, BYTES
or RECORDS)
Average record unit (M, K, or U)
Primary quantity . . 1 (In above units)
Secondary quantity 10 (In above units)
Directory blocks . . 0 (Zero for sequential data set) *
Record format . . . . U
Record length . . . . 80
Block size . . . . .
Data set name type (LIBRARY, HFS, PDS, LARGE, BASIC, *
EXTREQ, EXTPREF or blank)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
i tried giving 0 and blanks in the block size.
Please advise.
Thanks
Agni |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CICS Guy
Senior Member
Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Posts: 2146
Location: At my coffee table
|
|
|
|
Blocksize 80
Record format F |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Agni
New User
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
No CICS Guy. This is also not working.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CICS Guy
Senior Member
Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Posts: 2146
Location: At my coffee table
|
|
|
|
| So the same JCL works when SYSUT1 is instream but not when SYSUT1 is pointing to an 80 byte unblocked flatfile or an 80 byte PDS member, is this correct? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aaru
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 1287
Location: Chennai, India
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Agni
New User
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Thanks Aaru. It worked fine after I added my domain. But the mail didn't reach others.
Thanks
Agni. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aaru
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 1287
Location: Chennai, India
|
|
|
|
Agni,
Ideally it should work. Hope you have given the correct email address. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Agni
New User
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Hi Aaru,
The mail IDs which i gave were correct only. Will there be any reason for this as I was able to receive the mail but others didn't? Should I need to add any thing else in my parm card?
Thanks
Agni. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aaru
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 1287
Location: Chennai, India
|
|
|
|
agni,
Is your mail address and the other receipients address in the same domain? say if u r wking for company ABC then try sending mails to the mail id's with domain ABC.com !
This is what i could think of ! I always use IKJEFT01 to send mails instead of IEBGENER. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Agni
New User
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Aaru,
When I used IKJEFT01 it worked fine  . Thanks all for your help
Regards
Agni |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aaru
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 1287
Location: Chennai, India
|
|
|
|
You are welc  me |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Agni
New User
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I am starting this conversation again as i am having some problems in this.
In one of the regions when i used %SMTPSEND, it didn't work and i got the following error.
| Code: |
1READY
%SMTPSEND
COMMAND SMTPSEND NOT FOUND
READY
END
|
Then I searched the PROCLIB whether is there any PROC step used to send the mail from mainframes. I found that one of the job was using SMTPMAIL. But that job was not running in production. I tested anyway using SMTPMAIL. But it also got failed. I got the below error.
| Code: |
1READY
SMTPMAIL
COMMAND SMTPMAIL NOT FOUND
READY
END
|
Can anyone help me out on this?
Thanks
Agni |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Is there some reason that you are not running this in batch?
My guess is that you are trying to run a proc online and the proclib is not available to your tso session.
I'd suggest you simply submit the jcl and run this in batch.
Maybe there is something i misunderstand. . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Agni
New User
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Hi Dick,
Thanks for your reply. I just ran it in batch only. It was one of the PROC steps. In other regions it is working fine. In this region only, it is not working.
Cheers
Agni |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hi Agni,
I'd suggest you talk with the system support people as to why this is not available in the region where it is "not found". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Agni
New User
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Thanks Dick. I will do that.
Regards
Agni |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
You're welcome - good luck
I suspect it is a missing or mis-named library. . . or mail is not supported from that region. . .
d |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
