View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
mainframenaidu
New User
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 6
|
|
|
|
I have 4 steps in my job.
A GDG is being created in step2.
The created GDG will be used as input to the next step ie step3.
Job is abended in the step3 . I don't want to make any changes to the job, ie when i restart from abended step(STEP3), is that will work or any other way to do
Thanks,
Naidu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sunnyk
New User
Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 59
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Please provide the layout of ur JCl.Are you taking taking the correct version of GDG in the step3 i.e (+1)????
And if your job abends in step 3 and u want to restart from step3 only, then you need to put GDG version as (+0).
I guess this will do.
Please someone having better idea clarify.
Regds
sunny |
|
Back to top |
|
|
priyabrata mohanty
New User
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 Posts: 8 Location: bangalore
|
|
|
|
hi sunnyk,
can u give the jcl coding for the problem?
regards,
mohanty. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sivatechdrive
Active User
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 191 Location: hyderabad
|
|
|
|
Hi naidu
in GDG the execution depends on Job,
so if any abend occurs in any step of the job the data set is not created..example a job has 2 steps
in step1 you are creating Generation data set as
TT.MVS.GDG(+1)
if any error in step2 and job abends the generation data set that we are trying to create in step1 is not succesfull,so we need to run the whole job
Thanks
Siva |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mainframemouli
New User
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Posts: 52 Location: Mysore
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
if any error in step2 and job abends the generation data set that we are trying to create in step1 is not succesfull,so we need to run the whole job |
The GDG will be created even if there is a abend in the suceeding step but if you are trying to refer to that GDG then a JCL Error message will be displayed,
Example:
step2 ==> a GDG version is created using X.Y.Z(+1)
step 3 ==> X.Y.Z(+1) is Referred and the job abended.
then GDG X.Y.Z.G0001v00 will be created and if you try to access then an JCL ERROR will occur.
The solution is you can Delete the Current version and Run the job from the beginning.
hope this helps. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anuradha
Active User
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 247 Location: Hyderabad
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
I have 4 steps in my job.
A GDG is being created in step2.
The created GDG will be used as input to the next step ie step3.
Job is abended in the step3 . I don't want to make any changes to the job, ie when i restart from abended step(STEP3), is that will work or any other way to do |
Hi Naidu,
While restarting you need to refer step3 GDG's generation with(+0) or else you can delete the current generation(created in second step) and can restart the job if you dont want to do any changes to job.
Hope this helps.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jeyaprakashmN
New User
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 4 Location: Bangalore
|
|
|
|
See,you have 4 steps in youa job.
A GDG is being created in step2.
The created GDG will be used as input to the next step ie step3.
Job is abended in the step3 .
First see the error message from SPSF , why step 3 is abend, recorrect the step 3., Save the job ,
Run the JOB.
Thats All , Don't change any New generation number because if the job is not sucessfully run., So generation number for step still (+1) only not (0).
Jeya Prakash Narayanan.M |
|
Back to top |
|
|
radhakrishnan82
Active User
Joined: 31 Mar 2005 Posts: 435 Location: chennai, India
|
|
|
|
mainframenaidu wrote: |
I have 4 steps in my job.
A GDG is being created in step2.
The created GDG will be used as input to the next step ie step3.
Job is abended in the step3 . I don't want to make any changes to the job, ie when i restart from abended step(STEP3), is that will work or any other way to do
Thanks,
Naidu |
Yes.It will work.There is no harm to the GDG created if the job aborts at the third step.As it is used as a input to the the third step,the disposition should be SHR.so you can restart the job from the aborted step without any change in the input GDG(after checking output dataset).
Anuradha,
Please dont delete the current version and re-ran the job.Though it will be a correct one,it will increase your processing time and wastage of resource utilisation.It will add up yours resource cost unnecessarily.
My advice is not to delete the current GDG as it will be a very hard move to undertake it.sometimes it will result in the loss of a dataset.
Output dataset shud be a worrying factor and a considerable one in case of abort in that step.We can also avoid overlooking into the output dataset if the disposition parameter is set as DELETE during abnormal execution of the step.
Check whether the output dataset is DELETE during abnormal execution.
If yes,you can restart the job from that step.Otherthings ,there is no need to change the input GDG.
shud you have any concerns pls get back to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
superk
Global Moderator
Joined: 26 Apr 2004 Posts: 4652 Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
|
|
|
|
Wrong.
The other posters are correct. The generation specified in STEP3 must be changed from "+1" to "0 or +0" in order to properly restart in this step.
The proper solution to this problem is to change the dataset used in STEP2 and STEP3 to a normal cataloged sequential (QSAM) dataset, and only create the new generation in the very last step of the job. Or, end the first job after STEP2, and start a new job at the point of where STEP3 begins. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mmwife
Super Moderator
Joined: 30 May 2003 Posts: 1592
|
|
|
|
You can also make the gen# a symbolic using (+1) as the default. If the job abends you can restart it w/a (+0). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
radhakrishnan82
Active User
Joined: 31 Mar 2005 Posts: 435 Location: chennai, India
|
|
|
|
superk wrote: |
Wrong.
The other posters are correct. The generation specified in STEP3 must be changed from "+1" to "0 or +0" in order to properly restart in this step.
The proper solution to this problem is to change the dataset used in STEP2 and STEP3 to a normal cataloged sequential (QSAM) dataset, and only create the new generation in the very last step of the job. Or, end the first job after STEP2, and start a new job at the point of where STEP3 begins. |
superk,
The GDG, version control is handled by Job termination routines. Even though we create a +1, it becomes a 0 level, after Job termination.So that is the reason why you keep +1 in the job, wherever the dataset is refered in the same job and in the same run.
For GDG it will always say as 'ROLLED IN' and not 'RETAINED' as for the normal datasets. The 'Rolledin' is 'ROLLEDOUT' at job termination and then only the version is available.
If the job terminates abnormally then there is a STOP to the flow and not END to the control flow.Hence GDG version (+1) will indicate the current version inside the same job.
Unless it is forcecompleted or re-ran we need to put (+1) version rather than giving (0) version inside the same job.
As when the job aborts, the GDG dsn is rolled into the GDG structure. Provide this GDG DSN in form of absolute generation number(aaa.XXX.G123V00) to the operators and they will take care to have this inserted in the abended step and run it from the current PDS itself. If this is not a scheduled job, you will have to restart it from the step with the version as (0). Hope this answers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
somasundaran_k
Active User
Joined: 03 Jun 2003 Posts: 134
|
|
|
|
radhakrishnan
You said in your first post
Quote: |
Yes.It will work.There is no harm to the GDG created if the job aborts at the third step.As it is used as a input to the the third step,the disposition should be SHR.so you can restart the job from the aborted step without any change in the input GDG(after checking output dataset).
|
and in your second post
Quote: |
The GDG, version control is handled by Job termination routines. Even though we create a +1, it becomes a 0 level, after Job termination.So that is the reason why you keep +1 in the job, wherever the dataset is refered in the same job and in the same run.
|
Don't you think it's a contradiction?
All other posters said is that the GDG should point to the current generation ,ie '0' before you restart at STEP3
since +1 is not applicable when you restart this job.
Regds
-Som |
|
Back to top |
|
|
radhakrishnan82
Active User
Joined: 31 Mar 2005 Posts: 435 Location: chennai, India
|
|
|
|
There were two cases happening in job aborts:
1)Once the job aborts,then the job gets completely disconnected with the submitted id.In this case,after job aborts,if you need to restart the job then it is same as submitting a new job.
2)The job moves to hold once the job aborts.If you need to restart after the abort then the control lies within the job and it is entirely different from the job that follows the process of the first step.
which one you are talking about?
Was the job moves to hold after it gets aborted or is it like the first case? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
radhakrishnan82
Active User
Joined: 31 Mar 2005 Posts: 435 Location: chennai, India
|
|
|
|
For scheduling systems,the version (+1) is applicable during restart.
Scheduling systems belong to the second case where in which your job
flow STOPS during aborts.
If you mean to say that your job flow terminates with ur submitting id after the abort then as per case 1,version (0) is applicable.It is same as submitting a new job.hence (0) is applicable for GDG's during restart.
Need help from superk to correct me if Iam wrong with my details. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|