|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
vinodkumar.rao
New User
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 4
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a VSAM file having the following definition:
DEFINE CLUSTER(NAME' DSNS '-
REUSE -
VOLUMES(' OVOLSER '))-
DATA(-
RECORDSIZE(9237 18327)-
KEYS(22 0)-
CISZ(30720)-
CYL(20 30))-
INDEX(-
CISZ(512))
This is allowing me to load a maximum of 1118400 records into it. When i try to load data of more than this, it gives me an overflow error as follows:
IDC3351I ** VSAM I/O RETURN CODE IS 28 - RPLFDBWD = X'2908001C'
Please suggest, what parameters need to be adjusted to load data of more than 2200000 records. I have tried with various options but in vain. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
William Thompson
Global Moderator
Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Posts: 3156
Location: Tucson AZ
|
|
|
|
| vinodkumar.rao wrote: |
| IDC3351I ** VSAM I/O RETURN CODE IS 28 - RPLFDBWD = X'2908001C' |
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea1h351/14.546?SHELF=&DT=20001024055330&CASE=
| Quote: |
An error was encountered during virtual storage access method (VSAM) open, close, or action request processing, as indicated in the text of the message.
The return code, as follows:
For a Logical I/O Error
28
Data set cannot be extended because VSAM cannot allocate additional direct-access storage space. Either there is not enough space left to make the secondary allocation request, you attempted to increase the size of a data set while processing with SHROPT=4 and DISP=SHR, or the index CI is not large enough to hold the entire CA. This error could also be due to a data set trying to extend beyond 4GB on a system that does not support extended addressability. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vinodkumar.rao
New User
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 4
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot.
But I guess, this is already available from the quick view (QW). I am aware. Can i have a solution to this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
William Thompson
Global Moderator
Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Posts: 3156
Location: Tucson AZ
|
|
|
|
Is there is enough space left to make the secondary allocation request?
Did you attempt to increase the size of a data set while processing with SHROPT=4 and DISP=SHR?
Is the index CI is large enough to hold the entire CA?
Are you trying to extend beyond 4GB on a system that does not support extended addressability? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
