View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
kalhor
New User
Joined: 20 May 2007 Posts: 31 Location: iran
|
|
|
|
Nothing more, i think initialize is the last way. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6248 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Hi Expat,
What I was thinkng & recall for such problems, normally the file is cataloged in the wrong UCAT requiring LISTC ENT for the HLQ, UCAT and then matching up with entry in VVDS. IBM 'fixed' it eons ago by adding a nocheck if you use the MCAT name for the CAT parameter. . . but. . .
May be other alternative is to use the “Resynchronize ICF Catalog” (FUNC=RE) and specify the ALIASLVL= parameter and CATLGCHK=Y . . . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 8796 Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
Yeah, after checking out the message codes, that was what I thought about the entry being in a catalog that does not have the alias pointing to it. Usually the master catalog.
Then you have to specify the REAL catalog which has the entry in it in the DELETE NVR parameter. You can also list out the VVDS and see which catalog association is with the NVR entry.
After my last comment, I was rather hoping that the OP might have tried it out and reported back, but hey |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|