View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10888 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
simulate the same situation to run a batch job like this? |
it happened at a customer location...
never had any problem sharing in the way You are trying...
we sometimes had some read inconsistencies due to a programming glitch
of not enqueuing properly ( buffer refresh issue )
( we also changed the option to share 4 which refreshes the buffers for the read )
but a question comes to my mind ..
do You have on that cluster a aix/path define with the upgrade option ??
that could be the problem.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10888 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
( we also changed the option to share 4 which refreshes the buffers for the read ) |
please delete the quoted statement from my previous append...
never do brain multitasking ... :-) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FazerKing
New User
Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 18 Location: HK
|
|
|
|
Yes.....sorry man....did not mention the alternative index. The program file came with the alternative index.....is that the major problem on file sharing? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FazerKing
New User
Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 18 Location: HK
|
|
|
|
Never mind. The sharing is now working. Thanks guys. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|