|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
06650998
New User
Joined: 20 Jul 2021
Posts: 1
Location: PERU
|
|
|
|
I HAVE PROCESSED JOINKEYS FOR TWO FILES OF LENGTH=242, FILE INPUT=39 REGS, PAIRED=37 AND THE NEXT FILE HAS 38 RGS, PAIRED=34, BUT THE FILE OUTPUT RESULTS OUT 247 REGS
DOES ANYONE KNOW WHY IS THAT??
ATTACH SORT REPORT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joerg.Findeisen
Senior Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 1258
Location: Bamberg, Germany
|
|
|
|
| Expect nobody to download attached unverified files. Also ALL UPERCASE QUESTIONS are being ignored as it is considered unrude. Please respecify what is wrong, providing Input/Output/Err Msgs of your code. Simple as that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sergeyken
Senior Member
Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 2024
Location: USA
|
|
|
|
| 06650998 wrote: |
| DOES ANYONE KNOW WHY IS THAT?? |
Because:
| Quote: |
| There’ll be trouble if the cobbler starts making pies. |
1) read and learn the Forum rules
2) learn the basics of the table processing technics
3) do some training in that area
4) try to make initial research of the problem by yourself
5) try to make some experiments by changing your code and/or your data, and to verify the difference
Only after 1-5 have been completed try the next steps:
6) exclude irrelevant information (95%) from your question
7) include the required, but missing information on your issue, using the formats and styles recommended by the Forum rules. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joerg.Findeisen
Senior Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 1258
Location: Bamberg, Germany
|
|
|
|
Topic should be moved to SYNCSORT Section of the forum.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rohit Umarjikar
Global Moderator
Joined: 21 Sep 2010
Posts: 3053
Location: NYC,USA
|
|
|
|
Welcome!
It should have been145,03,A. Retry.
Please follow the rules as mentioned above as a reminder. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joerg.Findeisen
Senior Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 1258
Location: Bamberg, Germany
|
|
|
|
| Rohit Umarjikar wrote: |
| It should have been 145,03,A |
How do you know without the data? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sergeyken
Senior Member
Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 2024
Location: USA
|
|
|
|
| Joerg.Findeisen wrote: |
| Rohit Umarjikar wrote: |
| It should have been 145,03,A |
How do you know without the data? |
A Random Number Generator? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joerg.Findeisen
Senior Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 1258
Location: Bamberg, Germany
|
|
|
|
| sergeyken wrote: |
| A Random Number Generator? |
You could write any number here w/o using a machine.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rohit Umarjikar
Global Moderator
Joined: 21 Sep 2010
Posts: 3053
Location: NYC,USA
|
|
|
|
| Joerg.Findeisen wrote: |
| Rohit Umarjikar wrote: |
| It should have been 145,03,A |
How do you know without the data? |
I don't but there is no right way to get results when 3 bytes joined with 10 bytes. If TS really interested further we should see sample data else its going to be a close guess work based on what has been shared.
So I suggest , we must wait further and give a chance for TS to respond before we talk off topics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joerg.Findeisen
Senior Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 1258
Location: Bamberg, Germany
|
|
|
|
| Rohit Umarjikar wrote: |
| I don't but there is no right way to get results when 3 bytes joined with 10 bytes. |
Keys have to be of same length, so the logic of the Join process is basically wrong to what's intended. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
