Portal | Manuals | References | Downloads | Info | Programs | JCLs | Mainframe wiki | Quick Ref
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Memberlist Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
Speed-up/reduce CPU use of code

Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> PL/I & Assembler
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Author Message

Senior Member

Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 1095
Location: Oostende, Belgium

PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 12:05 am    Post subject: Speed-up/reduce CPU use of code
Reply with quote

One of the programs I'm responsible for requires some new functionality, Top-nn tables, at least one summary set of three (Top-50) of distance, time, and velocity, but potentially rather a lot more, like the same set (but only as a Top-10) for each year (currently 36), each type (currently 18), country (currently 29 + 1), and nationality (currently 89).

Due to the fact that the number of items to process is unknown, all data is held in linked lists, but the sort is done on an, obviously controlled, array of of pointers to the various items in said linked list. So far, so good, this works like a charm for the summary tables, just take the first 50 items, put them into a table, and "Bob's your uncle..."

Producing the other Top-nn's can use the same sorted arrays, and that's what I'm doing at the moment, and it works flawlessly, but it's not exactly efficient, as there are sets that contain just a few items, in which case, should you wonder, the Top-10 might be reduced to a Top-7, Top-3, or in rather more than a few (27!) cases, a Top-1...

And those are the ones that are highly inefficient, as I have to go through almost the entire array to find the first item using the following:

#h = hbound(distance.d_ptr, 1);
#i = #h;

do c = 'K', 'T', 'V';
  #t = 0;

  do #i = #h to lbound(distance.d_ptr, 1) by -1 until(#t = #top_nn);
    list_ptr = distance(#i).k_ptr;  /* or time.t_ptr/velocity.v_ptr */

    if sty_tcn = 'N' & tcn = this_list.nat  | /* 89     */
       sty_tcn = 'Y' & sty = this_list.year | /* 36     */
       sty_tcn = 'C' & tcn = this_list.cnty | /* 29 + 1 */
       sty_tcn = 'T' & tcn = this_list.type | /* 18     */
       sty_tcn = '*' then                     /* 1 (summary) */
        #t = #t + 1;

        if #t = 1 then
            if c = 'K' | sty_tcn = '*' then
                #h = #i;
                write file(outfile) from(pline);
                write file(outfile) from(top_nn_sep);
                write file(outfile) from(top_nn_head);
                write file(outfile) from(top_nn_sep);
        line           = top_nn_init;
        top_nn_line    = this_list, by name;
        top_nn_line.v  = round(this_list.vx, 1);

I do a little bit of caching (actually a hell of a lot for the what turn out to be the Top-1 tables) by saving #i in #h for #t = 1 & c = 'K', but can someone suggest an even more efficient way. And no I don't want to sort individual sub-lists, as that's more than likely going to cost way more CPU than the current approach.

Any ideas?

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> PL/I & Assembler All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1


Search our Forum:

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Posted
No new posts IMS error U4038 while executing my PL... abdulrafi IMS DB/DC 2 Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:05 pm
No new posts Conditional setting of return-code af... sanvan COBOL Programming 9 Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:05 pm
No new posts IBEGENER RETURN CODE 12 anilkumar922 All Other Mainframe Topics 5 Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:41 am
No new posts Finding the plan when code compiled u... Ahemad DB2 2 Fri Dec 01, 2017 6:38 pm
No new posts Strange Code amitc23 COBOL Programming 6 Tue Nov 28, 2017 11:25 am

Back to Top
Job Vacancies | Forum Rules | Bookmarks | Subscriptions | FAQ | Polls | Contact Us