|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Ricardo Viegas
New User
Joined: 18 Oct 2012
Posts: 39
Location: Brasil
|
|
|
|
At the SMF manual, there is the following description of field "R723CRCP" in record type "72":
| Quote: |
| "Count of transaction completions for this period. This field includes transaction completions reported by subsystem work managers via the IWMRPT service." |
If the record refers to a service class that only have batch jobs, what is the meaning of "transaction completions"? I suspect it is Jobs, would I be correct? Or would it be Steps or anything else?
Thx, Ricardo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vasanthz
Global Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 1742
Location: Tirupur, India
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I think it is jobs. Each job is accounted as a transaction in 72.
You could try to validate this transaction count from type 72 with the number of jobs from type 30 subtype 5(job or task termination) for that particular service class.
I personally have not tried it, If you are able to get a solution, please let us know.
Regards, |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vasanthz
Global Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 1742
Location: Tirupur, India
|
|
|
|
Just noticed that the thread is aptly under "General Talk & Fun Stuff"
SMF - So Much Fun
Will move it to "other topics" unwillingly :S |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ricardo Viegas
New User
Joined: 18 Oct 2012
Posts: 39
Location: Brasil
|
|
|
|
Hi Vasanthz!
Thanks for the suggestion; I will try it and inform later.
Sorry for the wrong forum... 
Regards, Ricardo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vasanthz
Global Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 1742
Location: Tirupur, India
|
|
|
|
Hello Ricardo,
I was not being sarcastic :-)
I really like working with smf.
good day, |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PeterHolland
Global Moderator
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2481
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ricardo Viegas
New User
Joined: 18 Oct 2012
Posts: 39
Location: Brasil
|
|
|
|
Hello Vazanthz and Peter!
Vazanthz, I understood that you was not sarcastic, do not worry about that, and thanks for moving the thread to the correct forum.
Peter, thanks for the info. In your second reference there is not a direct affirmation that R723CRCP could mean jobs ended, but we came to that conclusion after quickly analyzing the formulas presented there.
Rgrds, Ricardo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
