Portal | Manuals | References | Downloads | Info | Programs | JCLs | Master the Mainframes
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index
 
Register
 
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Memberlist Usergroups Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
 

 

SYNCTOOL better than SYNCSORT?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> SYNCSORT
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Author Message
Amit_Singh

New User


Joined: 23 Jul 2014
Posts: 3
Location: india

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:06 am    Post subject: SYNCTOOL better than SYNCSORT?
Reply with quote

Hi There!


I was working on a project and came across SYNCSORT and SYNCTOOL.
I also read that SYNCTOOL calls SYNCSORT in the background. I though had a question on the performance of SYNCTOOL.

Is the performance of SYNCTOOL better than SYNCSORT?

I mean if I have one million records in a PS, then does using SYNCTOOL will make processing faster than using SYNCSORT?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Amit_Singh

New User


Joined: 23 Jul 2014
Posts: 3
Location: india

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply to: SYNCTOOL better than SYNCSORT?
Reply with quote

Any replies? I really need to get this information..i have been searching the net..since no proper documentation of synctool is available im unable to find the required information
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Woodger

DFSORT Moderator


Joined: 09 Mar 2011
Posts: 7228

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply to: SYNCTOOL better than SYNCSORT?
Reply with quote

Since SyncTool won't work without SyncSort, I'm nott sure the question makes much sense in general.

Some SyncTool operators could be directly replaced by a SORT step: the advantage of having the operators is that multiple operators can be specified in the same step, whereas multiple executions of SORT require multiple steps.

There is probably some performance impact on this (SyncTool slower) but the easiest thing is for you to try it out if it is of such interest to you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Amit_Singh

New User


Joined: 23 Jul 2014
Posts: 3
Location: india

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply to: SYNCTOOL better than SYNCSORT?
Reply with quote

Thanks!

Yes it is of interest to me. I was thinking of running both the files through 2 jobs, one using syncsort other using synctool.

However, as you said that synctool helps us combinig some syncsort steps into one step, so is the time required for setting up individual steps using syncsort significant?

If there is some extra time that is required for setting up each step, the region, etc, in syncsort steps, maybe I can direct my study in that direction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> SYNCSORT All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

Search our Forum:

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Posted
No new posts syncsort: copy lines after the keyword shreya19 SYNCSORT 6 Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:47 am
No new posts Syncsort - Hard coded Value in output PORYES SYNCSORT 1 Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:23 am
No new posts Syncsort - NULL in Integer field chec... nartcr SYNCSORT 4 Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:47 am
No new posts ICETOOL/SYNCSORT - SYSPRINT output nartcr DFSORT/ICETOOL 17 Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:46 pm
No new posts Syncsort version supporting FINDREP c... juares castro SYNCSORT 9 Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:54 pm


Facebook
Back to Top
 
Mainframe Wiki | Forum Rules | Bookmarks | Subscriptions | FAQ | Tutorials | Contact Us