|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
sathiyendran.erulan
New User
Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Location: chennai
|
|
|
|
While performing any of the below query getting RLCP abend in CICS screen.
select count(*) into l-nbr-cnt from cust_data where cust_nbr between 100000000 and 999999999 and substr(char(cust_nbr),6,4='4907' and cust_type in (' ','0');
select count(*) into l-nbr-cnt from cust_data where cust_nbr between 100000000 and 999999999 and mod(cust_nbr,10000)=4907 and cust_type in (' ','0');
cust_nbr declared as decimal(9,0) in table and cobol equivalent used in code that PIC s9(9) comp-3.
05 l-nbr-count pic s9(4) comp-4.
Expected output is to retrieve all the cust_nbr ending with 4907.
Please advice me to resolve this abend. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dbzTHEdinosauer
Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne
|
|
|
|
change l-nbr-count to PIC S9(9) COMP.
are CUST_NBR, and CUST_TYPE in an INDEX
| Quote: |
| Expected output is to retrieve all the cust_nbr ending with 4907 |
well, if that is your expected output,
then change COUNT(*) to CUST_NBR
and why is this being done in CICS?
if that is the 'requirement', the 'requirment' is stupid.
actually, what you should do is: - unload CUST_DATA where cust_type in (' ','0')
- use a SORT product to determine the count of each of the last 4 of CUST_NBR
- publish the output to everybody that needs this sensitive and important piece of info
- and then move on to more important business problems
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dbzTHEdinosauer
Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne
|
|
|
|
as far as RLCP abend,
I found this while google'n
| Quote: |
RLCP is an ABEND code issued by the CANDLE Omegamon CICS Product indicating that
a transaction has exeeded a limit of CPU seconds
set in the OMEGANON Global parameters
for the CICS addresspace being monitored. It can be overridden. Consult OMRGAMON documentation. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
You found some reason to post this same question again?
You were given the same hint about the cause of the RLCP (from me) with confirmation from another member in the original topic.
All this did was to show inconsideration and waste several people's time.
This duplicate is being locked. Maybe TS will now implement properly (in batch). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
