Portal | Manuals | References | Downloads | Info | Programs | JCLs | Master the Mainframes
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index
 
Register
 
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Memberlist Usergroups Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
 

 

Batch execution of Superc

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> TSO/ISPF
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ronny John

New User


Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 33
Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:25 pm    Post subject: Batch execution of Superc
Reply with quote

Hi,

I tried the batch execution of superc(ISPF 3.13 option). The mismatch report in sysout has length 133 bytes.

If my mismatch lies in 300th byte, though i can see the record woth mismatch from the sysout, i wont be able to see the actual field value as the mismatch happened in 300th byte and the report only displays 133 bytes.

IS there a way to make the sysoout to 1000 bytes? i tried to save the sysout to a file,but even that has only 133 bytes displayed.

please advice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

enrico-sorichetti

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10276
Location: italy

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:49 pm    Post subject: Reply to: SUPERC
Reply with quote

Quote:
IS there a way to make the sysoout to 1000 bytes?


NO!

here You will find all You might want to know about ISPF and friends
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/ISPZPM70
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anuj Dhawan

Senior Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6258
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:03 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Please learn to search the Forum:

http://www.ibmmainframes.com/viewtopic.php?t=25508&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ronny John

New User


Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 33
Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply to: SUPERC
Reply with quote

Let me ask another query

CMPCOLMN 1:72 CMPCOLMO 9:80

this caompares the bytes from first 1 to 72 of the new file, wth the colomns 9 to 80 of the old dataset- For SUPERC.

Let me know if i can add another level of comparison in the same step

CMPCOLMN 80:100 CMPCOLMO 81:101 along with the CMPCOLMN 1:72 CMPCOLMO 9:80...in th same step?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anuj Dhawan

Senior Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6258
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:24 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Well, when people help you with ready made links - it looks bad when you don't show efforts to learn the things. Since finding information in the manual may not be that easy, here are a few hints:

1. Look at this part of the manual. You might like to pay special attention to LONGLN process option and LSTCOLM process statement also.

2. Also, you can try the secret PF1 trick: hit PF1 and try to find your way to Process Options and Process Statements.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ronny John

New User


Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 33
Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply to: SUPERC
Reply with quote

Hi Anuj,

Every bit of effort is well noted and thanks you all of you for that. I have tested it and it seems to be working. The options you mentioned are not pointing to my issues, but anyways thanks. And the delay in responding is becaus e i am tied up with mutiple issues.

CMPCOLMN 80:100 CMPCOLMO 81:101 along with the CMPCOLMN 1:72 CMPCOLMO 9:80... both can be used in the same card.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anuj Dhawan

Senior Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6258
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:33 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Good, you find it out. And if you look at your original post, you'll understand why I've mentioned about point 1 of my previous post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phrzby Phil

Active Member


Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 964
Location: Richmond, Virginia

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 5:25 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Now that you know the position, copy each file starting just before that position and then compare those files.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ronny John

New User


Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 33
Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply to: Batch execution of Superc
Reply with quote

Thank you Phil..Its working!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> TSO/ISPF All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

Search our Forum:

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Posted
No new posts HLIST Utility In Batch Virendra Shambharkar TSO/ISPF 4 Fri Apr 07, 2017 3:38 pm
No new posts Batch job tuning sgandhla Testing & Performance analysis 5 Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:41 pm
No new posts MIPS/CPU consumption reduction in Batch vishwakotin DFSORT/ICETOOL 4 Sat Mar 18, 2017 5:46 pm
No new posts How does a called pgm know if its cal... Graeme Westerman COBOL Programming 5 Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:25 pm
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. MIPS reduction for Batch job Virendra Shambharkar All Other Mainframe Topics 8 Mon Nov 07, 2016 4:02 pm


Facebook
Back to Top
 
Mainframe Wiki | Forum Rules | Bookmarks | Subscriptions | FAQ | Tutorials | Contact Us