IBM Mainframe Forum Index
 
Log In
 
IBM Mainframe Forum Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Register
 

File status - 35


IBM Mainframe Forums -> COBOL Programming
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RAJA-RAJA

New User


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 10
Location: chennai

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:03 pm
Reply with quote

Iam getting file status - 35 on opening the PS file in input mode. The DD name in the JCL is also correct. Please advice on what may be the cause.

Thanks.

JCL : (1 record is present in input file)
//DD010 DD DSN=Hxxx.B.GExxx.INPUT.NEW.B,
// DISP=SHR

pgm:
SELECT DEFA-IN ASSIGN TO UT-S-DD010
FILE STATUS IS WS-DEFA-IN-STATUS.
::

FD DEFA-IN
RECORDING F
LABEL RECORD STANDARD
RECORDING MODE F.
BLOCK 0.
01 GEDKDEFA-REC.
05 DEFA-NR-DOSS-077DOSS PIC X(20).
05 DEFA-NR-SDOS-077SDOS PIC X(20).
05 DEFA-CO-CLASS-077SDOS PIC X(02).
05 DEFA-NR-DEBIT-ACCOUNT PIC X(14).
05 FILLER PIC X(24).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pravesh

New User


Joined: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 32
Location: Gurgaon

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:25 pm
Reply with quote

how come DD name more then 8 bytes UT-S-DD010 . It can be max of 8 in length(in JCL and pgm).

Thanks,
Pravesh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
expat

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:49 pm
Reply with quote

Pravesh wrote:
how come DD name more then 8 bytes UT-S-DD010 . It can be max of 8 in length(in JCL and pgm).
OK, so I haven't played COBOL for over 30 years, but doesn't the JCL DD name to be allocated start after UT-S-, so is restricted to 8 bytes from that point onward.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anuj Dhawan

Superior Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:50 pm
Reply with quote

Expat is corect - UT-S -> is "an old way of coding in cobol", wehre in you tell the system what kind of device the program is going to deal with. So yes, as far as, DD-name in COBOL progrm is concerned - that's correct.

I just hope the file exist - status-code 35 asks for this. Also, your choice of DD-name is not that user-friendly -- are you sure, you've not used alphabet-O instead of number-0 in DD statement or vice-versa?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbzTHEdinosauer

Global Moderator


Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:05 pm
Reply with quote

you receive a 35 on open when
  • you coded your program and jcl accurately and the physical file does not exist
  • you have not coded your program and jcl accurately and the file exists


dd name is not same in jcl and pgm
dsn is inaccurate
file does not exist
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:46 pm
Reply with quote

Hello,

Remove the FILE STATUS and note which error/abend happens. . .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
icemanroh

New User


Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 25
Location: Mumbai

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:48 pm
Reply with quote

Code:
FD DEFA-IN
RECORDING F
LABEL RECORD STANDARD
RECORDING MODE F.


Why have u declared Recording mode twice?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic View Bookmarks
All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Forum Index -> COBOL Programming

 


Similar Topics
Topic Forum Replies
No new posts Compare 2 files and retrive records f... DFSORT/ICETOOL 3
No new posts FTP VB File from Mainframe retaining ... JCL & VSAM 8
No new posts Extract the file name from another fi... DFSORT/ICETOOL 6
No new posts How to split large record length file... DFSORT/ICETOOL 10
No new posts Extracting Variable decimal numbers f... DFSORT/ICETOOL 17
Search our Forums:

Back to Top