|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Sureet Mookherjee
New User
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 19
Location: India
|
|
|
|
In my Mainframe project, We have created a new DB2 Stored Procedure (SP), which will be invoked online from VBA (Visual Basic Application).
We have designed this SP to access the table base as well as the DB2 tables. We have below queries as we are getting -430 or -471 while executing this SP.
1. Is it possible to have DB2 concept along with Table base concept?
2. If yes, then how the table base is invoked in online flow? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dbzTHEdinosauer
Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne
|
|
|
|
?? Table base concept? sorry, I am just a dumb old IBM programmer, not sure what you mean by 'Table base'.
-471 is rather detailed (gives a reason code). Basically your SP has some problems. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
Is it possible to have DB2 concept along with Table base concept?
|
the issue should have been debated and planned at requirement setting and software procurement time (*)
(*) in plain words when Your employer bought/did_spend_money on the software
somebody should have already known what to do/what could be done with it |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| Sureet Mookherjee wrote: |
| We have designed this SP to access the table base as well as the DB2 tables. |
I'm not very sure if I got the meaning of bold text in above quote. 
| Quote: |
| 1. Is it possible to have DB2 concept along with Table base concept? |
Dick is an old(polished) programmer and 'am a new one -- but sorry I also dont' know about this"Table Base concept"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| oh, did you mean "tableBASE" -- a third-party vendor product owned and maintained by Data Kinetics Ltd.? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
