|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| Time to kill this discussion. . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
THINKSRINIII
Warnings : 1
New User
.jpg)
Joined: 09 Jan 2009
Posts: 88
Location: India
|
|
|
|
Hi Nevilh..
Could you throw more light on to it.. Like on how to do it..That will be very helpful i guess.
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martin9
Active User
Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 290
Location: Basel, Switzerland
|
|
|
|
Hy,
just note this:
if you are using the standard security on z/OS, which is RACF,
then place your data into any PDS beginning with your UID as
HighLevelQualifier, then your data is protected..
But there will be always someone who has more authorities than you!
Therefore: if you have sensitive data, stored it on your notebook!
regards,
martin9 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8697
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| if you are using the standard security on z/OS, which is RACF, |
Actually, there are a number of security packages which can be used on z/OS ... RACF is IBM'S package but certainly not the only choice. The security package used is a site option. They all provide similar functionality but not necessarily in exactly the same way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| Time to kill this discussion. . . |
could not agree more
topic locked
reasons ....
the topic itself is utter nonsense
it' s against any ethics behavior
it' s against any rules on IP created on employer time and employer equipment
it puts under a bad light the ibmmainframes organization by having it's members
provide hints on how to behave against any reasonable practices and standards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
