IBM Mainframe Forum Index
 
Log In
 
IBM Mainframe Forum Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Register
 

Most efficient copy utility?


IBM Mainframe Forums -> Testing & Performance
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
new2cobol

New User


Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 77
Location: Bangalore

PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:51 pm
Reply with quote

My experiance with DFSORT and SYNCSORT says DFSORT is better and faster. Not sure whether it is cheaper...

How ever, please use SORT options when you are talking of records numbering in millions. IEBCOPY should be a better option for small files, I guess.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enrico-sorichetti

Superior Member


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy

PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:55 pm
Reply with quote

Quote:
IEBCOPY should be a better option for small files, I guess.

look at the manual to find out why IEBCOPY cannot be used icon_biggrin.gif
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anuj Dhawan

Superior Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:48 pm
Reply with quote

Hi,

My experience differ a little in this regard - I've an in house utility (MULTIGEN) used for this purpose, surprgingly for in-house left others behind. Below are the statistics of a copy operation with differnt utilites done recently:
Code:
For Records : 5,02,922  Utility : Multigen      CPU Time : $0.10     
For Records : 5,02,922  Utility : IEBGENER      CPU Time : $0.14
For Records : 5,02,922  Utility : SORT          CPU Time : $0.13     
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:14 pm
Reply with quote

Hello,

It is important to note that cpu time is not the issue when copying files. If an organization wants to measure how "good" a copy process is by using cpu time they are making a huge mistake. As was posted, even the biggest user uses almost none.

The big issue with measuring a copy process is how much i/o does it do and how well is the i/o done.

Another consideration is whether the copy is for "a file" or if it is a backup of many files. For many files, suggest dfdss, fdr, or something similar be considered as they are designed for high-volume backup/restore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jaspal

New User


Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 68
Location: mumbai

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:43 am
Reply with quote

Hi Anuj D ,

MULTIGEN is faster and consume less CPU time when copying data
from one dataset to other.
In our shop we generally use multigen ,sort and IDCAMs , if there are no
calculation ( i.e sorting) we use MULTIGEN for taking backup etc.

Thanks,
Jaspal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Debabrata Pruseth

New User


Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Posts: 59
Location: Pune , India

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:46 am
Reply with quote

Hi Mark

This below Forum thread also has some good information.

---> www.ibmmainframes.com/viewtopic.php?t=37467&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic View Bookmarks
All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Forum Index -> Testing & Performance

 


Similar Topics
Topic Forum Replies
No new posts VB to VB copy - Full length reached SYNCSORT 8
No new posts REASON 00D70014 in load utility DB2 6
No new posts Need COBOL COPY Help in MVS Environment COBOL Programming 4
No new posts Issue after ISPF copy to Linklist Lib... TSO/ISPF 1
No new posts DB2 Table - Image copy unload IBM Tools 2
Search our Forums:

Back to Top