|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
wang_f_y1
Warnings : 1
New User
Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 47
Location: shenzhen
|
|
|
|
when i from panel s.d.4 and select channel.when i start my channel,
Name Type Disposition Status
SYSTEM.DEF.SENDER SENDER QMGR CSQ5 INACTIVE
error message showed,below error message.
CSQX036E !CSQ5 CSQXSUPR Unable to open , MQCC=2 MQRC=2085
CSQ9023E !CSQ5 CSQXCRPS ' START CHANNEL' ABNORMAL COMPLETION
who konw that why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
the manual will certainly know,
why not look it up Yourself
a message explanation is something that is not IT culture, but must be looked in the manual
starting from, for example
and proceeding to
and continuing ...
to arrive at the end to
and ......
to find out that ....
| Quote: |
MQRC_UNKNOWN_OBJECT_NAME
Revision| An MQOPEN or MQPUT1 call was issued, but the object
Revision| identified by the ObjectName and ObjectQMgrName
Revision| fields in the object descriptor MQOD cannot be
Revision| found. One of the following applies:
Revision| ° The ObjectQMgrName field is one of the
Revision| following:
Revision| - Blank
Revision| - The name of the local queue manager
Revision| - The name of a local definition of a remote
Revision| queue (a queue-manager alias) in which the
Revision| RemoteQMgrName attribute is the name of the
Revision| local queue manager
Revision| but no object with the specified ObjectName and
Revision| ObjectType exists on the local queue manager.
Revision| ° The object being opened is a cluster queue that
Revision| is hosted on a remote queue manager, but the
Revision| local queue manager does not have a defined
Revision| route to the remote queue manager.
Revision| ° The object being opened is a queue definition
Revision| that has QSGDISP(GROUP). Such definitions
Revision| cannot be used with the MQOPEN and MQPUT1 calls.
Revision| Corrective action: Specify a valid object name.
Revision| Ensure that the name is padded to the right with
Revision| blanks if necessary. If this is correct, check the
Revision| queue definitions. |
aaarghhhhhh I did it again  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wang_f_y1
Warnings : 1
New User
Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 47
Location: shenzhen
|
|
|
|
i have already started my channel.
but i want to configrate the trigger up this channel.
everybody know how to process.the man had better give me a sample |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bill Dennis
Active Member
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 562
Location: Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
Do you want to trigger the channel to start when msgs need to be sent?
If so:
1) on the XMITQ for the remote queue, assign TRIGGER=F and set Initiation Queue to SYSTEM.CHANNEL.INITQ (if that is your name). Also, assign a Process name. We use 'qmgr1.TO.qmgr2.PROCESS'
2) define the new process named above, including Type=MVS, ID = CSQX START and User Data = channel.name |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
so if You started Your channel I just lost time looking up the messages for You
that all Your bytes loose their parity 
| Quote: |
| the man had better give me a sample |
or are You going to spank him/her???
with this wording You will not get anything, You are not paying to get IT consultancy
so You better straighten up You understanding on how forum(s) work |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bill Dennis
Active Member
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 562
Location: Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
enrico,
Since english is obviously not their first language, I wrote it off as a poor translation of "the manual had no good samples".
Maybe I was too generous? Yep, I did it again, too! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hi Bill,
| Quote: |
| Maybe I was too generous? |
No, i believe you were correct. Unfortunately, this particular misunderstanding happens a lot 
d |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
maybe I was a little carried away by the previous issue  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
