Portal | Manuals | References | Downloads | Info | Programs | JCLs | Mainframe wiki | Quick Ref
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index
 
Register
 
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Memberlist Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
 
Batch Pipe Concept

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> JCL & VSAM
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Author Message
ilakkia
Warnings : 1

New User


Joined: 17 May 2008
Posts: 28
Location: chennai

PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:30 pm    Post subject: Batch Pipe Concept
Reply with quote

I had to reduce the CPU time consumed by a job.
Hence i used the Batch Pipe concept for one particular file.
I overrided the actual file in DD name SORTOUT with a pipe file as shown below:

//STEP05R.SORTOUT DD DISP=SHR,
// UNIT=SYSDA,
// DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=4000,BLKSIZE=24000,BUFNO=30),
// SPACE=(TRK,(40000,9000),RLSE),
// LABEL=RETPD=01,
// SUBSYS=(BP01,'PIPEDEPTH=200'),
// DSN=TEST.PIPE.CXA100P1.TRADES.DX081511
//*

My doubt is how to choose the Batch Pipe subsystem name (its BP01 in the above case) and how to fix the PIPEDEPTH?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

enrico-sorichetti

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10311
Location: italy

PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply to: Batch Pipe Concept
Reply with quote

Quote:
My doubt is how to choose the Batch Pipe subsystem name (its BP01 in the above case) and how to fix the PIPEDEPTH?

ask Your support for the subsystem name
( we did not customize Your system, they did )
look at the manual for an explanation of the pipedepth parameter
( its , IIRC, related to the DCB bufno parameter )
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
expat

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8593
Location: Back in jolly old England

PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:39 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Not sure on how using Batch Pipes will reduce the CPU time as there will be no reduction in actual processing, all of the records will still be processed in exactly the same way as before but with the added overhead of the batch pipes processing.

Do you perhaps mean the elapsed time of the job ???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ilakkia
Warnings : 1

New User


Joined: 17 May 2008
Posts: 28
Location: chennai

PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:22 pm    Post subject: BatchPipes
Reply with quote

Yes, I meant the Elapsed time of the job.

Thanks,
Ilakkia
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
expat

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8593
Location: Back in jolly old England

PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:21 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Have you looked at other areas as well, optimum blocking, I/O bottlenecks, files being used and how they are used. Plus numerous others to consider.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> JCL & VSAM All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

Search our Forum:

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Posted
No new posts Generate public-private key in batch ... vasanthz All Other Mainframe Topics 3 Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:20 am
No new posts Working with hex values in Filemanage... Emile Straker IBM Tools 0 Tue Sep 12, 2017 1:42 am
No new posts Unable to copy data from spool in a d... srikant314 JCL & VSAM 8 Fri Jul 28, 2017 9:10 pm
No new posts IMS T-Pipe queue counts in a COBOL Pr... Siva NKK Kothamasu IMS DB/DC 2 Tue May 09, 2017 6:31 pm
No new posts HLIST Utility In Batch Virendra Shambharkar TSO/ISPF 4 Fri Apr 07, 2017 3:38 pm

Facebook
Back to Top
 
Job Vacancies | Forum Rules | Bookmarks | Subscriptions | FAQ | Polls | Contact Us