|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
superk
Global Moderator
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 4652
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
From the article:
| Quote: |
| but the reality is that it's quite difficult to create a break-in-proof facility |
I believe there is no way to keep out the "insiders" who are supposed to have access to the facility. . . If "they" choose to do bad things, i'm not sure how to prevent them - you might detect/track them, but prevention would be mch more difficult.
| Quote: |
| I can't imagine them maintaining any credibility in the marketplace after this has come to light. |
Unfortunately, notariety is better than being unknown. . . If they drop prices for a short while and "promise to do better", they will very possibly add customers. . .  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rpuhlman
New User
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 80
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
|
|
|
I can't help but wonder if data centers had this problem with the ENIAC?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Heh, heh, heh. . .
If you install the hardware and then build walls around it, it should be much tougher to walk off with. . .
Not unlike building a boat in the basement. . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
