View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
mcmillan
Site Admin
Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 1210 Location: India
|
|
|
|
Dear Cool_mainframe(?)
Good question! But there is no difference between IEWL and HEWL. I am not the creator of the linkers, but I got this idea, When Installing OS/390:
"An SMP/E UTILITY entry for the binder is required. You can specify any of these program names in the UTILITY entry: IEWBLINK, HEWL, IEWL, LINKEDIT, or HEWLH096" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pkmurali Warnings : 1 Active User
Joined: 15 Dec 2005 Posts: 271
|
|
|
|
mcmillan wrote: |
Dear Cool_mainframe(?)
Good question! But there is no difference between IEWL and HEWL. I am not the creator of the linkers, but I got this idea, When Installing OS/390:
"An SMP/E UTILITY entry for the binder is required. You can specify any of these program names in the UTILITY entry: IEWBLINK, HEWL, IEWL, LINKEDIT, or HEWLH096" |
HI,
i have seen HEWL is used in Cobol Compiler where as IEWL for COB-DB2 & COB-CICS link editor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pkmurali Warnings : 1 Active User
Joined: 15 Dec 2005 Posts: 271
|
|
|
|
mcmillan wrote: |
Dear Cool_mainframe(?)
Good question! But there is no difference between IEWL and HEWL. I am not the creator of the linkers, but I got this idea, When Installing OS/390:
"An SMP/E UTILITY entry for the binder is required. You can specify any of these program names in the UTILITY entry: IEWBLINK, HEWL, IEWL, LINKEDIT, or HEWLH096" |
HI,
i have seen HEWL is used in Cobol Compiler where as IEWL for COB-DB2 & COB-CICS link editor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|