|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
easebourne_ironfist
New User
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Location: Hyderabad
|
|
|
|
HI Robert .
I have been trying running the given COBOL and getting below mentioned values in sysout
ALLOC DIAG CODE = 0000J
ALLOC KEY VALUE = 0064L
ALLOC DIAG CODE = 0000J
ALLOC KEY VALUE = 0064L
Also i see when BPXWDYN is getting called it returns -00000623 as return code .
I tried various ways of using BPXWDYN in Rexx and its working fine .
Is it like i need to modify the program in some way to run properly .
I did changed the LRECL ,BLCKSZE for my particular use .
Regards
easebourne_ironfist |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Woodger
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 09 Mar 2011
Posts: 7309
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Please don't tailgate an old topic, but start with a new question. Especially when the topic is a "Sticky".
Have you looked up what the various codes mean? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6248
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| easebourne_ironfist wrote: |
I tried various ways of using BPXWDYN in Rexx and its working fine .
Is it like i need to modify the program in some way to run properly .I did changed the LRECL ,BLCKSZE for my particular use . |
Are you not contradicting yourself - either it's working fine OR it's not and you need change - -what is it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10886
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
quite strange, I was curious...
downloaded/compiled/tested/WORKED AS IS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
easebourne_ironfist
New User
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Location: Hyderabad
|
|
|
|
HI Bill ,
Yes i did tried to understand the meaning of codes .
10 WS-BPXWDYN-RC2 > -0643 (ALLOC KEY VALUE )
10 WS-BPXWDYN-RC1 > -0001 (ALLOC DIAG CODE)
I get an idea that there is some key error while calling BPXWDYN.But why is it happening ,i am unable to understand . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
easebourne_ironfist
New User
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Location: Hyderabad
|
|
|
|
Hi Anuj,
I guess the mentioned COBOl program is supposed to have the same effect as below rexx .
ALLOCSTR = "ALLOC DD(G035DD01) DSN('TEST.JXB.PRADEEP.PS')",
"NEW CATALOG REUSE RELEASE",
"RECFM(F,B) UNIT(SYSDA) DSORG(PS) LRECL(80) BLKSIZE(0)"
CALL BPXWDYN(ALLOCSTR)
I meant this RExx is running fine . but COBOL seems to have some problem
Please suggest the meaning of these codes and where exactly i am going wrong . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10886
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
from Your initial post
| Quote: |
I have been trying running the given COBOL and getting below mentioned values in sysout
|
it looked like You were trying to run the READPDS cobol example
BPXWDYN has some quirks...
a couple of keywords are different from the <equivalent>ones for allocate |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
easebourne_ironfist
New User
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Location: Hyderabad
|
|
|
|
Tried a lot but couldnt fix the problem .
But still thanks a lot to Robert for introducing me to 'BPXWDYN' . I guess its best to use it with REXX.
Just in case anybody has a clue these are the values of the variables i get on calling 'BPXWDYN'
05 WS-BPXWDYN-RC > -00000643
10 WS-BPXWDYN-RC1 > -0001
10 WS-BPXWDYN-RC2 > -0643 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8700
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
| You have provided the equivalent REXX code to what you want the COBOL to do, but you have not posted the COBOL allocation statement (use a DISPLAY just before the CALL to BPXWDYN). BPXWDYN does have some quirks, and it is EXTREMELY sensitive to the parameters being passed to it -- but from what I've seen, once you get the exact parameters specified there is no difference between the COBOL and REXX calls to BPXWDYN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10886
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
just in case anybody has a clue these are the values of the variables i get on calling 'BPXWDYN'
|
the manual certainly does 
as per bpxwdyn doc
| Quote: |
Understanding Key Errors
The low order two digits is the number of the key that failed the parse, offset by 20. The first key will have the value 21.
The high order two digits is a diagnostic code that indicates where in the code the parse failed. If the high digits are 0, the key itself was probably not recognized. Other values usually indicate a problem with the argument for the failing keyword. Likely causes are blanks in arguments that are not quoted and spelling of key names.
Understanding Dynamic Allocation Error Codes
The return code contains the dynamic allocation error reason code in the high two bytes and the information reason code in the low two bytes.
You can use the high four hex digits to lookup the error code in the dynamic allocation error reason codes table found in the Application Development Guide for Authorized ASM Programs.
|
nobody will do the manual reading and decoding for You |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6248
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PeterHolland
Global Moderator
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2481
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen
|
|
|
|
| Look for IKJ or IEF messages. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
easebourne_ironfist
New User
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Location: Hyderabad
|
|
|
|
Thanks Robert ,
Problem found . Parameter were getting misalligned .SHR was coming as as SH R .Also since DS name was DELIMITED BY SPACE and i had space between the DS name and column 1 it didnt picked the DS . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
easebourne_ironfist
New User
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Location: Hyderabad
|
|
|
|
| Thanks to Anuj too for posting the links . It improved my understanding on BPXWDYN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
easebourne_ironfist
New User
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Location: Hyderabad
|
|
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Thanks for enlightneing me 
I did looked key error descrption in "Using REXX and zOS UNIX System" manual but couldnt make much out of it . Didnt knew what 'key' meant exactly in this context . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6248
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| Thanks for the follow up and telling what worked for you. Appreciate that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
