|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
PeterHolland
Global Moderator
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2481
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen
|
|
|
|
| I guess a job running iefbr14 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sanupadh
New User
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Posts: 11
Location: chennai
|
|
|
|
Its a dummy job I have created to test the JCL only.
but I need to replace this by job ZFV1710 (abended job)
and start it from step C5171035 with GDG(0) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nic Clouston
Global Moderator
Joined: 10 May 2007
Posts: 2454
Location: Hampshire, UK
|
|
|
|
| Ignore - hadn't read the second page. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nic Clouston
Global Moderator
Joined: 10 May 2007
Posts: 2454
Location: Hampshire, UK
|
|
|
|
| Why not split job A so that it stops after STEP04. Then run STEP05 to the end as a seperate job. Then you can restart this job automatically. No need to change the GDG from +1 to 0. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
What causes this "acceptable abend"? How does it magically get corrected? As Vasanthz asked - "What if the job A never runs successfully?"
From what little that has been posted, it sounds like the cause of the abend is also a scheduling opportunity. . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prasanth_thavva
New User
Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 86
Location: Chennai
|
|
|
|
I don't think you need to schedule Job B using schedular, if yet all if the job down with specified return code in internal reader step just specify the condition and invoke the Job B and always has the required parameters set for this job,
pls let me know if i am wrong |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19243
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
| Quote: |
| I don't think you need to schedule Job B using schedular, if yet all if the job down with specified return code in internal reader step just specify the condition and invoke the Job B and always has the required parameters set for this job, |
I do not understand what this is suggesting . . . 
| Quote: |
| pls let me know if i am wrong |
Yes, i believe this is incorrect. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
