|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
shrutika
New User
Joined: 10 May 2008
Posts: 5
Location: India
|
|
|
|
| Can someone help me to understand the difference between PGM=SORT and PGM=IGHRCO00. I tried googling, but did not get any solid information about IGHRCO00. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
I found it in google after about 30 seconds.
IGHRCO00 is an alias. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arun Raj
Moderator
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 2481
Location: @my desk
|
|
|
|
| DFSORT Programming Guide wrote: |
| use PGM= either with the actual name of the sort module (ICEMAN) or with one of its aliases: SORT, IERRCO00, or IGHRCO00 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shrutika
New User
Joined: 10 May 2008
Posts: 5
Location: India
|
|
|
|
| So would this mean I could replace PGM=SORT with PGM=IGHRCO00 and it would always return the same results? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
| Why not try it out and see for yourself |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
for what reason would You want to invoke IBM DFSORT
with an alias which dates back to 1977 ( at least ) ,
similar dates for the other alias IERRC000 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shrutika
New User
Joined: 10 May 2008
Posts: 5
Location: India
|
|
|
|
| I saw this in some of the jobs and was just curious since I could not locate much info on this other than that it is an alias. I really do not intend to invoke this at all. Thanks for the info that this dates back to 1977 :-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PeterHolland
Global Moderator
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2481
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen
|
|
|
|
shrutika,
you could have posted your question in 1977  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Maybe. . . .
Many of our participants were not yet born in 1977 . . . 
d |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Garry Carroll
Senior Member
Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 1193
Location: Dublin, Ireland
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| you could have posted your question in 1977 |
...and you would probably still have got a recent answer. Some people seem to love reviving old threads....
Garry.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| dick scherrer wrote: |
| Many of our participants were not yet born in 1977 . . . |
True...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Craq Giegerich
Senior Member
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 1512
Location: Virginia, USA
|
|
|
|
| dick scherrer wrote: |
Maybe. . . .
Many of our participants were not yet born in 1977 . . .
d |
Some of us were in our 30's by 1977. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
