|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
ankoo
New User
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 31
Location: India
|
|
|
|
By using the following JCL I am able to grab the comparison result but the MAXCC=4 is comming, anybody having any idea why it is comming??
//CMPRTST1 JOB (ACCT#),'SORT ',NOTIFY=&SYSUID,CLASS=T,MSGCLASS=X
//SUPERC EXEC PGM=ISRSUPC,
// PARM=(DELTAL,LINECMP,
// ' SEQ',
// '')
//NEWDD DD DSN=First File,
// DISP=SHR
//OLDDD DD DSN=Second File,
// DISP=SHR
//OUTDD DD DSN=Output file,
// DISP=OLD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
| ankoo wrote: |
| By using the following JCL I am able to grab the comparison result but the MAXCC=4 is comming, anybody having any idea why it is comming?? |
Isn't it obvious from the messages given by your job why the RC is 4. But don't expect any help from us because you can not be bothered to post any output.
Perhaps you would be better suited to the beginners forum found HERE rather than the technical forum here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| ankoo wrote: |
| ... but the MAXCC=4 is comming, anybody having any idea why it is comming?? |
You've used PGM=ISRSUPC for comparsion, I get rc=0 when both datasets are identical, rc=1 if they aren't. RC=4 is not common for me?
Also, this thread is pretty old, you should have started a new one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| anybody having any idea why it is comming?? |
Yes
since You asked for a Yes/no answer that' s what You are going to get
are You aware that the manuals were written with the objective of providing
answers to these questions  
start from
www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/index.html
and click on the zOS level You are using |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| RC=4 is not common for me? |
maybe because Your jcls are correctly written  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
| Quote: |
| but the MAXCC=4 is comming, anybody having any idea why it is comming?? |
Yes, and so should you. . .
As you have chosen not to post the diagnostic info generated by the run, you are the only one who has the info. . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
no need to post the info, it is enough to look at the output of the run and after that at the manual
but since he did not care to he had to ask somebody else to do what he is being paid for
let' see if the TS is willing to do some work himself |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| enrico-sorichetti wrote: |
| Quote: |
| RC=4 is not common for me? |
maybe because Your jcls are correctly written |
Wish my manager logs-in here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
| Anuj Dhawan wrote: |
| Wish my manager logs-in here! |
And see's you dressed like that 
WOW, that must be some relaxed office that you work in |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| LOL - how radically can you think, I wonder! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
