|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Havish Yerneni
New User
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Location: Hyderabad,India
|
|
|
|
Hi Everyone,
While batch processing i faced an abend with message "CONDITION CODE=112 DADBI005 REQUEST NOT PROCESSED. NOT ENOUGH SPACE ON QUEUE TO PROCESS ALL REQUESTS." The step was mainly trying to allocate a few files to CICS executing the pgm=DADBBI and it abended with the above message. Can anyone help me in understanding the reason behind abend and the solution that can avoid these abends from abending again? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Binop B
Active User
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 407
Location: Nashville, TN
|
|
|
|
Hi Havish,
First of all... "abends" do no abend again... its programs or JCL's that abend... 
I do not have much idea about DADBBI utility, but probably u can have a look here....
www.ibmmainframes.com/viewtopic.php?t=26952&highlight=dadbbi
As told... the manuals available from the site should have some details on what causes CC=12. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
| Binop B wrote: |
| ... its programs or JCL's that abend... . |
Actually, AFAIK it is only programs that abend.
/RANT ON
Once more let us clarify exactly what JCL is.
it is Job Control Language.
By itself it does nothing. It is used to invoke the chosen program and to define which datasets are to be used by the DD names associated with the chosen program.
JCL does not have magical powers that solve all problems, JCL is merely the vehicule for telling the processor which program you want it to execute.
/RANT OFF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Binop B
Active User
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 407
Location: Nashville, TN
|
|
|
|
yep... that's also true...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anjali_tcs
New User
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
Posts: 10
Location: GGN
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to check if i can paste the resolution to this from CA DADS message guide...Can i? should i?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Yes you can, just "quote" the lines from the manual here. Posting a scrap from manuals in limit will not breach any copyright act. (just in case you had been thinking about that.)
If you have manuals available to you as an end user -- they should not be linked via the forums, as a good practice. Just in case, some one does that, some good Moderators ('am not included) are just around... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anjali_tcs
New User
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
Posts: 10
Location: GGN
|
|
|
|
Thanks Anuj for your reply...i was actually wondering about copyright violation only...
So now that it is ok to quote one from the Message guide...here is what it says for the error code of DADBI005
| Quote: |
DADBI005 REQUEST NOT PROCESSED. NOT ENOUGH SPACE ON QUEUE TO PROCESS ALL REQUESTS.
Reason: The request(s) could not be processed due to the batch interface file not having
enough room for the requests. The batch interface may need to be increased in
size, or there are to many active queued requests currently on the batch
interface file.
Action: Contact your system program and have the batch interface file queued requests
listed, and increased in size if necessary. |
Hope this helps
AB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
You're welcome Anjali, hope this reply may help some in near future...
Have a nice stay here, |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Havish Yerneni
New User
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Location: Hyderabad,India
|
|
|
|
| increased the batch interface file with more space and it worked. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| Thanks Havish for letting us know the final solution you used. But anyhow, I feel little dumb, when Anjali and you use the term "increased the batch interface" -- what exactly do you mean by this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Havish Yerneni
New User
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Location: Hyderabad,India
|
|
|
|
| actually the space for the batch interface file was increased through CICS bounce |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
oh..CICS is not my cup of tea, that's why I did not get that..  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
