View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
kumarreddyuppaluru
New User
Joined: 17 Mar 2008 Posts: 8 Location: Bangalore
|
|
|
|
Hi,
In our project , jobs are scheduled through control-m. i got a abend recently. It is giving JCL ERROR , UNEXPECTED CATALOG LOCATE PROCESSING ERROR - RETURN CODE
when i checked the dataset, i observed that got migrated. The same kind of problem came with other job also. I restarted the job and it went fine.
But my doubt is when we submit the job, JCL is able to recall the file, But it is not able to recall when it is submitted through control-m.
Could some one please tell me how i can eliminate this in future.
The following is info abt the dataset
General Data Current Allocation
Management class . . : MCPRDDEF Allocated tracks . : 1
Storage class . . . : SCMASTER Allocated extents . : 1
Volume serial . . . : SMAL7P
Device type . . . . : 3390
Data class . . . . . : DCHSM Current Utilization
Organization . . . : PS Used tracks . . . . : 0
Record format . . . : FB Used extents . . . : 0
Record length . . . : 80
Block size . . . . : 9040
1st extent tracks . : 1
Secondary tracks . : 60
Data set name type : SMS Compressible : NO
Creation date . . . : 2004/06/26 Referenced date . . : 2009/06/16
Expiration date . . : ***None*** |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10873 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
not enough info,
what does Your storage support group say |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kumarreddyuppaluru
New User
Joined: 17 Mar 2008 Posts: 8 Location: Bangalore
|
|
|
|
Sorry ,
Return code is 38 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 8797 Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
Yes, has happened before. The program opens the file which is currently being recalled, and then throws a wobbly.
You need to ensure that any migrated files are recalled before the batch job is processed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gcicchet
Senior Member
Joined: 28 Jul 2006 Posts: 1702 Location: Australia
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm sure it has nothing to do with job being submitted through Control-M.
Gerry |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6250 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
I'm sure it has nothing to do with job being submitted through Control-M. |
Ditto.
Kumar -- Don't you get some mesage-ID assosciated with that error description?(IGD04001I ?). One probable reason can be that HSM recalls fail due to missing SMS volume.
And for this
Quote: |
Could some one please tell me how i can eliminate this in future. |
your best bet would be to get in contact with your storage support group as suggested by Enrico. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kumarreddyuppaluru
New User
Joined: 17 Mar 2008 Posts: 8 Location: Bangalore
|
|
|
|
Yes Anuj, i got description IGD04001I.
For this is there any possibility to do on my own? is it the only way (contact Storage support guys). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6250 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
If this is to do with Production runs -- strongly suggest you get in touch with Storage support or if it's a "test-region" thing you need to ensure that any migrated files are recalled before the batch job is processed, as Expat has suggested. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gcicchet
Senior Member
Joined: 28 Jul 2006 Posts: 1702 Location: Australia
|
|
|
|
Hi,
just add an IEFBR14 step to recall the files before they are needed.
Gerry |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6250 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Hi Expat, Gerry,
I'm not a storage guy so curious-- how in the production one will ensure such things, I mean "recalling migrated files before the batch job is processed" -- adding IEFBR14 is how good, what if every jobs has such DSNs to recall? What about the I-O time for such jobs? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 8797 Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
That's where a storage team that knows what happens is important. I always produce reports of datasets recalled by production jobs, and go talk to the JCL monkeys about the job schedules. If it is that the ILM has auto migrated the data, then the dataset would be allocated a different MGMTCLAS to retain it on DASD, depending on size.
Of course if it's one of the JCLM's that has migrated it manually, he usually gets informed to keep his grimy little mits off of my HSM.
For very large datasets, usually for ME and QE processing it's an automated recall one or two days before the scheduled run into a specific temporary storage group for the large stuff.
All so very easily controlled by correct setup of the ACS routines. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 6250 Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
If it is that the ILM has auto migrated the data, then the dataset would be allocated a different MGMTCLAS to retain it on DASD, depending on size. |
oh.. JCLMs have at least one way to escape..! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|