|
|
| Author |
Message |
superk
Moderator Team Head
Joined: 26 Apr 2004 Posts: 3314 Location: Charlotte,NC USA
|
|
|
|
| I've been around for a long time, and I honestly don't know the answer to this: when is it ever preferable to have a dataset defined with NUMS ON? or with PACK ON? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
References
|
|
 |
enrico-sorichetti
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 3183 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
I would say never...
but everything has exceptions,
as far as number on there might be standards to follow,
as far as pack that a no
the main issue is that the packing is transparent under ISPF
and You realize that something is wrong only when You use the thing as sysin for example
so my advice is no no to both questions
[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moved: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:50 pm by ofer71 From SMS & VSAM to TSO/ISPF |
dick scherrer
Global Moderator
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 8761 Location: 221 B Baker St
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| I would say never... |
Me too
IIRC, pack on was from the days when dasd space was precious and much of what was in a data pds was dead space.
d |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superk
Moderator Team Head
Joined: 26 Apr 2004 Posts: 3314 Location: Charlotte,NC USA
|
|
|
|
| Well, with all of the questions we see on these, I've been curious as to why the Sysprog's and/or Storage Admin's are creating datasets or dataset profiles with these attributes enabled? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dick scherrer
Global Moderator
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 8761 Location: 221 B Baker St
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I suspect that newbies (and some not-so-newbies) are cloning old existing datasets and don't even know they've "specified" these atributes. Realization comes when they "get bitten". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|