Hi frnd,
I think u may occur some problem once it runs parallely.. bcz as u said one is unloading a table and one takes image copy.. so it's better i think to run it in seperate schedule...
We can run the jobs parallely bcoz the jobid's will be different. The first job will execute in SYSA and the other job will run in SYSB servers.
Here awe are using two utilities called DSNTIAUL and DSNUTILB in which the first one is for Extracting the job log information thru JES2 or JES3 and the second is for copying the tables to the specified location.
According to my understanding, we can run the jobs parallely without any job contention.
Yes the Jobs can b ran parallely.. but his problem is one job is doing unloading a table and one takes image copy. so it's his problem.. can u get any solution now..???
guys, just to clarify things: we are talking unload n imagecopy of the same table(or tablespace for copy)..
now someone please tell me if there can b a contention prob??
Hi VG,
since imagecopy is used for taking backup like that.. v will surely get abend once u run both parallely... so v should try some other utility i think so..
but the thing is .. imagecopy is supposed to work on the tablespace level (physical) and the unload on the logical table right??i mean i am not sure if they should have a contention problem...
i have a suspicion.. and i would like someone to confirm it....(whether it happens or not)
Hi Guys,
you can run UNLOAD and IMAGE COPY in parellel. Because both will take share lock on the table/tablespace lock. there won't be any contention as I know.