|
|
| Author |
Message |
Bill O'Boyle
Active Member
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 991
Location: South Carolina, USA
|
|
|
|
The example parm supplied used PHA (Phasein) instead of NEWC. PHA will bring in the new version as soon as a RESCOUNT of ZERO is found by CICS. Whereas, NEWC will issue an error if the RESCOUNT is non-ZERO.
Does the target region use PPT Autoinstall or is there a pre-defined RDO/PPT entry already defined?
Under PPT Autoinstall, the CEMT command will only work if the PPT entry has already been built. Otherwise, it will raise an error.
But PPT Autoinstall will build the entry upon first usage/access of the target program by an application program in the target region. Pre-defined RDO/PPT entries are self explanatory.
I'm still not grasping what you're trying to accomplish?
By chance, is this a residual version of a program which had been loaded by a previous XPEDITER session and the programmer went home? If this is the case, then you must RELEASE the current version(s) and LOAD HOLD the new version.
Just a SWAG....
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
References
|
|
 |
k_rajen1
New User
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Location: Hyderabd
|
|
|
|
I don't have particular tran id for each program, that is the reason i want to use it through batch.
Bill,
Could you please tell me whether CEMT S PRog(prog-name) PHA will load new programs from PDS to CICS memory |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bill O'Boyle
Active Member
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 991
Location: South Carolina, USA
|
|
|
|
Please re-read my prevoious post, regarding PPT Autoinstall or RDO/PPT explicitly defined entries.
Do you need the program to be loaded permanantly into memory?
If this is the case, then you need to ask your Tech Support folks to define an explicit PPT entry to RDO for this program, specifying Resident = Yes. 99.9% (maybe 100%) of Autoinstall PPT templates don't specifying Resident = Yes.
When a program issues a LOAD PROGRAM API (and the PPT entry specifies Resident = Yes), it is not loading the program into memory, but merely establishing addressability.
If this is the case, then there's no reason to LOAD the program into memory as CICS will load it for you and it will not be paged out, with RESIDENT = YES.
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
William Thompson
Global Moderator
Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Posts: 3136
Location: Tucson AZ
|
|
|
|
| k_rajen1 wrote: |
| I don't have particular tran id for each program, that is the reason i want to use it through batch. |
Please define what you mean more clearly... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Earl Haigh
Active User
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 418
|
|
|
|
k_rajen1.
All this discussion perplexes me. Why don't you just ask your Technical support group to help you  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Global Moderator
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 13611
Location: 221 B Baker St
|
|
|
|
Hello,
What are you really trying to accomplish (the business or technical reason)?
You have spent a lot of time explaining the problem encountered with this approach but you have not explained what this is needed for.
| Quote: |
| Why don't you just ask your Technical support group to help you |
Hopefully, this is not just an attempt to run unapproved/undocummented code in the cics region. . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
