CPU Time and Elapse Time

ilakkia · New User Joined: 17 May 2008 Posts: 19 Location: chennai

Please explain the difference between the CPU time and Elapse time?

What are all the various factors that constitute the Elapse time?

expat · Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:22 pm Post subject:

Elapsed = Clock
CPU = amount of time CPU was utilised

Anuj D. · Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:48 pm Post subject:

Continued...

CPU time is the time for which the CPU was busy executing the task. It does not take into account the time spent in waiting for I/O (disk IO or network IO). Since I/O operations, such as reading files from disk, are performed by the OS, these operations may involve noticeable amount of time in waiting for I/O subsystems to complete their operations. This waiting time will be included in the elapsed time, but not CPU time. Hence CPU time is usually less than the elapsed time.

But in certain cases, the CPU time may be more than the elapsed time !When multiple threads are used on a multi-processor system or a multi-core system, more than one CPU may be used to complete a task. In this case, the CPU time may be more than the elapsed time.

Robert Sample · Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 2:58 pm Post subject:

It may not be possible to fully describe all the factors that constitute elapsed time, but for a batch job here are some of them:
CPU utilization
Number of jobs in system
System overhead
Initiators in use
Tape contention
Disk contention
Channel contention
Job priority
WLM policies

And there is a minimal correlation between CPU time and elapsed time. The exact same job can use the exact same about of CPU time and the elapsed time may vary by hours -- due to the above-mentioned factors, among others.

dick scherrer · Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:15 pm Post subject:

Hello,

As has been mentioned before, elapsed time itself is not a "tunable" parameter.

Elapsed time can be altered by tuning (positively or negatively) things in the environment (like reducing i/o, gettng a faster cpu, tuning database design and query structure, and on and on and on) or by tuning specific things in the process itself.

One situation that i see more and more frequently is some "requirement" that causes thousands or millions of records to be handled 3, 5, or more times just allow the requirement to be met "with a jcl". Sometimes there are multiple utility and/or sort steps requiring incredible amounts of system resources just so some small bit of program code can be avoided.

And once implemented they will not perform satisfactorily. . . And have a major impact on other processes in the system.

Pedro

Pedro

Judging by some of the questions in some of the forums, I think some people are writing rexx programs to schedule other jobs. I am assuming there is a lot of waiting for jobs to end. That is, in a scheme like that, the master would sleep most of the time, waking up every few minutes to see if a job ended. Elapsed time may be high, but CPU time low.