| IBM MAINFRAME HELP FORUMS for COBOL, JCL, CICS, DB2, IMS etc... Help & Support Forums for IBM Mainframe computers Applications like COBOL, JCL, CICS, DB2, FileAid, DFSORT, Endevor, Xpediter, CoolGen, CA-7, CA-11, AbendAid, IMS, IDMS, PL/I, MqSeries, SyncSort, Assembler, VSAM, ISPF, ChangeMan, Easytrieve, InterTest, REXX, CLIST etc...
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sukhmeet Singh
Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 8
Location: kolkata
|
| Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 4:04 pm Post subject: Functions NOT supported in COBOL |
|
|
Which of the following is/are not supported by COBOL?
RBA addressing, Skip-sequential or replacing existing record. |
|
| Back to top |
|
mmwife
Joined: 30 May 2003
Posts: 1480
|
| Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RBA addressing and Skip sequential are only supported in CICS. I guess that's what he's getting at. |
|
| Back to top |
|
CICS Guy
Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Posts: 1117
Location: At my desk
|
| Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 8:36 pm Post subject: Re: Functions NOT supported in COBOL |
|
|
The following are all out of the Enterprise COBOL for z/OS Programming Guide
hitler26 wrote: RBA addressing
Use the RELATIVE KEY IS clause to associate each logical record with its relative record number.
Quote: Skip-sequential
With dynamic access, you can switch between reading a specific record directly and reading records sequentially, by using READ NEXT for sequential retrieval and READ for random retrieval (by key).
Quote: replacing existing record
Updating records in a VSAM file |
|
| Back to top |
|
mmwife
Joined: 30 May 2003
Posts: 1480
|
| Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
The 1st source you cited is for a relative RECORD read. CICS allows a relative BYTE address read. It gives the CICS coder the ability to access an ESDS rec randomly.
The 2nd is not the same as a "skip sequential" read. In CICS the RIDFLD of the read stmt allows the the key to be skipped for the next read without changing modes or the read stmt; just move the new key to the RIDFLD before the next exec of the read. They say that a performance improvement results provided the gaps in the skips are reasonably small. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
THIS IS AN ARCIVE FORUM IN READ ONLY MODE. IF YOU WANT TO ASK YOUR DOUBTS USE THE ACTUAL FORUM
|