IBM Mainframe Forum Index
 
Log In
 
IBM Mainframe Forum Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Register
 

Passing Return Code to PROC


IBM Mainframe Forums -> CA Products
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mr.Niceguy

New User


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 63

PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 1:36 am
Reply with quote

Hi Guys,

Anybody tried passing the return code from Cool:gen to PROC as how we usually do in COBOL to PROC as shown below?

MOVE 300 TO RETURN-CODE.

I got a scenario to set the return code from Cool:Gen and I want my JCL to capture it.

Any suggestions will be appreciated.

Thanks,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 1:47 am
Reply with quote

Hello,

Is the Cool:Gen process running on the mainframe?

If so, look in the documentation to see if there is a way for the "user" to control the return code.

If the Cool:Gen process sets the return code, the JCL can use it just as though it was set by a COBOL progeram.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr.Niceguy

New User


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 63

PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:23 am
Reply with quote

Hi,

Yes, Generated COBOL code runs on the mainframe environment. I have verified the documents, so far no luck. I will post if I find something. I also do not see this kind of scenario to pass Return code from cool gen to JCL in all my existing applications.

Thanks,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 3:34 am
Reply with quote

Hello,

Generated COBOL code IS able to set the return-code. You may need to intercept the generated code and add the setting of the return code. Which may be a "people" issue.

If you see nothing in the documentation, suggest you open an issue with CA Support.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr.Niceguy

New User


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 63

PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 4:06 am
Reply with quote

Yes, that is also a good idea and even I thought of including the return code statement in the generated COBOL code. But every time, the same return code statement needs to be added along with the future changes. Because those added lines make out of sync between code in the endevor and code in the encyclopedia. If third person retrieves the code for future changes from encyclopedia, then the added line will be lost and that might create some issues in the PROC as it would behave based on the return code .

Thanks,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 6:27 am
Reply with quote

Hello,

If you go with the option of including the return-code this should be automated and a required part (and well documented) of the source management process.

I would surely ask CA as they will be aware of options we might not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic View Bookmarks
All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Forum Index -> CA Products

 


Similar Topics
Topic Forum Replies
No new posts run rexx code with jcl CLIST & REXX 15
No new posts Compile rexx code with jcl CLIST & REXX 6
No new posts Return codes-Normal & Abnormal te... JCL & VSAM 7
No new posts REXX code to expand copybook in a cob... CLIST & REXX 2
No new posts Passing Parameters to Programs Invoke... PL/I & Assembler 5
Search our Forums:

Back to Top