View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
harishcv
New User
Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Posts: 9 Location: India
|
|
|
|
Please help me to understand how the name REXX is derived from its expansion? REXX is Restructured EXtended eXecutor or is it REstructured eXtended eXecutor (see the caps/bold). The IBM's TSO/E REXX User's Guide says REstructured eXtended eXecutor ,while IBM's REXX User’s Guide and Reference says REXX is Restructured EXtended eXecutor. I did some further research in IBM sites and presentations and found a steady variation everywhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10873 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
TSO/E General Information
... REstructured eXtended eXecutor ...
User Guide
... REstructured eXtended eXecutor ...
Reference
... REstructured eXtended eXecutor ... |
seems pretty consistent to me
Pretty useless speculation anyway ...
a different acronym demangling really does not endanger REXX functionality
unless You have proof that using the manuals with a different demangling
produces wrong results
in which case You should open an APAR with IBM support.
why do You feel that it would make a difference in understanding and using REXX ???
the form I quoted are the same used by Mike Cowlishaw here
speleotrove.com/mfc/files/cowlishaw1984-design-of-REXX.pdf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
harishcv
New User
Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Posts: 9 Location: India
|
|
|
|
Thank you Enrico. Yes this will never make a difference in understanding and using REXX.
link which states the other expansion: (we can see many variations if we google REstructured eXtended eXecutor)
wi.wu-wien.ac.at/rgf/rexx/tmp/eagu0mst.pdf
The wikipedia says - "Originally the language was called Rex, (Reformed Executor); the extra "X" was added to avoid collisions with other products' names.For the product it became REXX, and both editions of Mike Cowlishaw's book use all-caps."
Since i happen to find two variations in the expansion, i started thinking if the second one(Restructured EX..) has something to do with the history of REXX(which was initially just REX).
just trying to understand the evolution and variations of the language which i've been using for quite a while . Now i am quite clear after going thru the link shared by you.
Thanks again. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
don.leahy
Active Member
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 765 Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
|
|
|
|
This might be an example of a retronym. (i.e. come up with a cool sounding name and then figure out what the letters stand for. SPUFI may be another one; the first definition I saw was "Systems Programmer User Friendly Interface". ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daveporcelan
Active Member
Joined: 01 Dec 2006 Posts: 792 Location: Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
This reminds me of when I was young (a long time ago), there were IBM commercials on television.
At the end it showed on the screen IBM - Word Processing
I thought it said 'Word Progressing', and they have not come up with what IBM stood for. I thought, what is with that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pedro
Global Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 2547 Location: Silicon Valley
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
just trying to understand the evolution and variations of the language which i've been using for quite a while |
Now that you know the answer for the NAME, how did it help you with understanding the LANGUAGE? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
harishcv
New User
Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Posts: 9 Location: India
|
|
|
|
The name didnt as i thought initially, but going through the "The design of the REXX Language" link shared really helped in understanding the language better. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|