Portal | Manuals | References | Downloads | Info | Programs | JCLs | Master the Mainframes
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index
 
Register
 
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Memberlist Usergroups Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
 

 

Getting S0C9 abend in filemanager

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> Compuware & Other Tools
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Author Message
balakrishna reddy.bala

New User


Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 17
Location: india

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:53 am    Post subject: Getting S0C9 abend in filemanager
Reply with quote

Hi All,

I am trying to accumulate data in a tape file, For this i am using FILEMANAGER, Till yesterday the job was running fine. Today the job was abended with S0C9, As per the last run details the record count in the accumulated file is 2121301983.

S0C9 generally comes when divide by zero occurs, But in this scenario it is little bit confusing, Can any one throw some light on this.

Thanks in advance!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

enrico-sorichetti

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10203
Location: italy

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:02 am    Post subject: Reply to: Getting S0C9 abend in filemanager
Reply with quote

since the program You are using was not developed in house,
You have nothing to help You debug the problem,
why not open a ticket with compuware ???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbzTHEdinosauer

Global Moderator


Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 7:46 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

File-Aid is compuware.

FILEMANAGER is IBM.

2 billion records is a doubleword starting with 7E.
not a tape man myself,
but is there a limit
to the number of records
that can be written to a tape file?

it is outdated, but the TS's system may also be old.
Do a find on S0C9 on this page
indicates S0C9 can also be associated with tape.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Woodger

DFSORT Moderator


Joined: 09 Mar 2011
Posts: 7236

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply to: Getting S0C9 abend in filemanager
Reply with quote

Definitely one for the software producer.

If dividing by that very large value for some reason, it is too easy to "truncate" to zero (not enough decimal places) and then use that for some division. Also high-order truncation could be possible if two billion records never envisaged in the product.

Why either filemanager/file-aid? With such a vast file, I'd think you'd want something that is doing only what it is asked and nothing else.

Anyway, vendor support or futile speculation. I'd go with the first.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
balakrishna reddy.bala

New User


Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 17
Location: india

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:50 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Hi,

Couldn't able to trace the reason why filemanager was abending with S0C9. I thought I will give a try with IEBGENER and It ran fine. Assuming there was a problem with huge number of records, we replaced the utility.

Thanks all for your valuable time!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Site Director


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19270
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 9:11 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Hello,

Suggest you consider using your SORT product. This will probably provide better performance than IEBGENER.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nic Clouston

Global Moderator


Joined: 10 May 2007
Posts: 1715
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 9:12 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

If you were just using filemanager to copy data then someone should be shot. Filemanager is a general utility - to just do a copy you should have used a dedicated copy utility - IEBGENER or ICEGENER. (OK they can do a bit more than simply copy but I would suspect that they are more efficient than Filemanager)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
balakrishna reddy.bala

New User


Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 17
Location: india

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:35 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Yeah Nic, Even the CPU time was reduced from 5 Min to 11 Sec when changed from FILEMANAGER to IEBGENER.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> Compuware & Other Tools All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

Search our Forum:

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Posted
No new posts IMS BMP program causes 878 system abend Artemk IMS DB/DC 7 Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:26 pm
No new posts abend sort based on count records in ... anatol DFSORT/ICETOOL 5 Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:10 pm
No new posts hot to get details when "EXEC CI... Andi1982 CICS 11 Tue Sep 20, 2016 5:01 pm
No new posts S213-14 ABEND explantion Apurva Mehta JCL & VSAM 5 Thu Jul 07, 2016 10:56 pm
No new posts How to determine where is error in ab... jackzhang75 PL/I & Assembler 13 Fri Apr 15, 2016 2:01 am


Facebook
Back to Top
 
Mainframe Wiki | Forum Rules | Bookmarks | Subscriptions | FAQ | Tutorials | Contact Us