|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
dbzTHEdinosauer
Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne
|
|
|
|
i assume you are doing this exercise in order to clean-up
the relationships between short-name and full name.
if so, is anything being done to amend the data input procedures
to prohibit this inconsistency in the future? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
southee
New User
Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Posts: 20
Location: INDIA
|
|
|
|
| dbzTHEdinosauer wrote: |
i assume you are doing this exercise in order to clean-up
the relationships between short-name and full name.
if so, is anything being done to amend the data input procedures
to prohibit this inconsistency in the future? |
Sorry dbz i havent got what you were trying to say? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dbzTHEdinosauer
Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 6966
Location: porcelain throne
|
|
|
|
why are you doing this analysis?
What will be done with the results?
If indeed short name should be a physical sub-set of full name,
is anything being done to prohibit future instances
of short name not being a sub-set of full name?
actually, those are all rhetorical questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
southee
New User
Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Posts: 20
Location: INDIA
|
|
|
|
| dbzTHEdinosauer wrote: |
why are you doing this analysis?
What will be done with the results?
If indeed short name should be a physical sub-set of full name,
is anything being done to prohibit future instances
of short name not being a sub-set of full name?
actually, those are all rhetorical questions. |
I'm working for a Project in IBM and these are the requirements from the clients.
I had got the requirements from the clients to match tw files in this way....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
