IBM Mainframe Forum Index
 
Log In
 
IBM Mainframe Forum Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Register
 

Multiple IDCAMs repro in 1 sysin card


IBM Mainframe Forums -> JCL & VSAM
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nigelosberry

New User


Joined: 06 Jan 2009
Posts: 88
Location: Ggn, IN

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 2:24 pm
Reply with quote

Hi Experts,

I tried searching the web for "multiple repro cards in 1 idcams sysin" but did not get any clear result. So I am starting a new topic. Apologies if this has already been discussed.

I remember quite well that I saw various IDCAMS cards In my first shop wherein we had multiple Key combinations(i.e. FROMKEY and TOKEY) inside a single sysin card. I gave it many tries today but failed initially when I tried reading multiple range of keys from VSAM file onto a sequential file but no luck.

Finally, I have now figured out a way to use multiple IDCAMS repro commands inside 1 sysin and write the output to a sequential file.

Code:

//PS030   EXEC PGM=IDCAMS                         
//VSAMFILE  DD DSN=T3.INVSAM.FILE1,               
//             DISP=(SHR,KEEP,KEEP),             
//             AMP='BUFSP=849960'                 
//SEQFILE   DD DSN=T3.INVSAM.FILE1.OUTSEQ,       
//             DISP=(MOD,CATLG,DELETE),           
//             UNIT=SYSDA,                       
//             SPACE=(10796,(100,10),RLSE),       
//             DCB=(SYS3.DSCB,DSORG=PS,           
//             RECFM=VB,LRECL=272,BLKSIZE=0)     
//SYSIN     DD *                                 
                                                 
 REPRO INFILE(VSAMFILE) -                         
      OUTFILE(SEQFILE) -                         
         FROMKEY('KEY00001')  TOKEY('KEY00099')   
 REPRO INFILE(VSAMFILE) -                         
      OUTFILE(SEQFILE) -                         
         FROMKEY('KEY11111')  TOKEY('KEY22222')   
                                                 


The trick is to use MOD in the disposition of the output sequential file. Each repro request is considered a separate request and data pertaining to it is "appended" to the output sequential file.

Experts, could you please let me know your views on this.
(1)Can there be any disadvantages of using this?
(2)Any improvement that can be done to it?

Cheers,
Nigel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterHolland

Global Moderator


Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2481
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 2:29 pm
Reply with quote

Well, the sort adepts/zealots will probably advice tu use sort.
If it works stick to it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 7:07 pm
Reply with quote

Hello,

If the volume is hundreds of records, stick to it.

If the volume is hundreds of millions of records, consider using sort for performance reasons.

Just my $.02 icon_wink.gif
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic View Bookmarks
All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Forum Index -> JCL & VSAM

 


Similar Topics
Topic Forum Replies
No new posts INCLUDE OMIT COND for Multiple values... DFSORT/ICETOOL 5
No new posts Replace Multiple Field values to Othe... DFSORT/ICETOOL 12
No new posts JCL sort card - get first day and las... JCL & VSAM 9
No new posts Multiple table unload using INZUTILB DB2 2
No new posts Grouping by multiple headers DFSORT/ICETOOL 7
Search our Forums:

Back to Top