|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
ravikumarreddy
Warnings : 1
New User
Joined: 29 Jul 2005
Posts: 23
|
|
|
|
In levelnumbers 01.77 ....... which is efficient and why?
regards,
ravi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
priyesh.agrawal
Senior Member
Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 1448
Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Athanga
New User
Joined: 29 Sep 2005
Posts: 9
|
|
|
|
hi ravi,
I think 77 should be effective....reasons are below....
77 level numbers are used only for elementary items.
01's are used for both elementary and group ....
when the program is compiled the compiler will look for the level numbers of each variable,if it is a 01 level ,the compiler will further have a search for other sub variables,here the time consuptions for execution will be more..if the same variable is defined with 77 level it will not search for the sub variables..
But,normally no companies prefer 77,if so they need more code change in future ...
I hope i am not wrong.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
leo_sangha
New User
Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 85
Location: England
|
|
|
|
| ravikumarreddy wrote: |
In levelnumbers 01.77 ....... which is efficient and why?
regards,
ravi |
Hi Ravi,
It is NOT a question of which one is efficient.
As "Athanga" has also mentioned that 77 level is used only for elementary level item numbers & 01 level can have sub levels also.
On the contrary i dont agree to the quote that
"System will automatically look for subvariables if 01 level is used".
I think if you compare the performance of 01 level and 77 level variables used as elementary items both will have the same impact & will utilize same CPU time.
Any suggestions are welcome.
Thanks
leo_sangha@yahoo.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
