However After running the jobI am getting below error. Please suggest if any modification required in my JCL?
Code:
SYNCSORT FOR Z/OS 1.1DR TPF3 U.S. PATENTS: 4210961, 5117495 (C) 2002
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP DATA CENTER NJ
PRODUCT LICENSED FOR CPU SERIAL NUMBER 6682E, MODEL 2086 230 L
SYSIN :
JOINKEYS F1=MASTER,FIELDS=(1,300,A)
*
JOINKEYS F2=KEY,FIELDS=(1,300,A)
*
REFORMAT FIELDS=(F1:1,300)
*
SORT FIELDS=COPY
OUTFIL FNAMES=OUT,OUTREC=(1:300)
WER275A NO KEYWORDS FOUND ON CONTROL STATEMENT
WER275A NO KEYWORDS FOUND ON CONTROL STATEMENT
WER275A NO KEYWORDS FOUND ON CONTROL STATEMENT
SYNCSORT FOR Z/OS 1.1DRI TPF3 U.S. PATENTS: 4210961, 5117495 (C) 2002 SYNC
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP DATA CENTER NJ z/OS
PRODUCT LICENSED FOR CPU SERIAL NUMBER 6682E, MODEL 2086 230 LICEN
CTL1CNTL :
INREC OVERLAY=(301:C'1')
*
WER428I CALLER-PROVIDED IDENTIFIER IS "0001"
WER268A INREC STATEMENT : SYNTAX ERROR
Code:
1SYT000I SYNCTOOL RELEASE 1.4D - COPYRIGHT 2003 SYNCSORT INC.
SYT001I INITIAL PROCESSING MODE IS "STOP"
SYT002I "TOOLIN" INTERFACE BEING USED
COPY FROM(IN1) TO(T1) USING(CTL1)
SYT020I SYNCSORT CALLED WITH IDENTIFIER "0001"
SYT012E SYNCSORT COMPLETED UNSUCCESSFULLY
SYT030I OPERATION COMPLETED WITH RETURN CODE 16
SYT015I PROCESSING MODE CHANGED FROM "STOP" TO "SCAN" DUE TO OPERATION FAILURE
COPY FROM(IN2) TO(T1) USING(CTL2)
SYT019I STATEMENT VALID; NOT PROCESSED DUE TO "SCAN" PROCESSING MODE
SELECT FROM(T1) TO(OUT) ON(1,300,CH) NODUPS USING(CTL3)
SYT019I STATEMENT VALID; NOT PROCESSED DUE TO "SCAN" PROCESSING MODE
SYT004I SYNCTOOL PROCESSING COMPLETED WITH RETURN CODE 16
Joined: 20 Oct 2006 Posts: 6970 Location: porcelain throne
i can understand that a place is too cheap to upgrade their software,
but I wonder if they have a valid license?
it is one thing for a company, in the name of cost-cutting,
to deprive systems and programming staff a current version of a general utility,
but it is another for the firm to cheat syncsort out of their license fee.
i admit, that I had assumed that this company:
has the use of a computer whether:
they rent off a bigger machine
or are a bunch of ex-salesmen that
have cheap options on hardware and
severely curtailed the op-sys software
and outsourced the application maintanence.
sounds like i was pretty close.
I wonder if this AIG Tech... is/was part of AIG Insurance Group?
If so, good luck Alissa, collecting anything from that bunch.
Joined: 09 Mar 2011 Posts: 7312 Location: Inside the Matrix
Odd for something to be running such old software. Syncsort has "keys" to validate the use of the product. Did they not in 2002?
nileshyp, looking at the JCL it says PGM=SYNCSORT. Are all your Sorts like that at your site? You didn't write that from scratch without thinking, did you?
If your site is running an old, unsupported, unlicenced product, I think you'd better let your boss know that it has accidently become public knowledge.
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 19254 Location: Inside the Matrix
Hello,
Lots of the "Syncsort systems" i've worked on use pgm=syscsort. As many simply use pgm=sort.
One of my sites only recently moved up from 1.1 to the newest 1.4. This after being cautioned that there may be incompatabilities when moving to z/OS 1.09 and 1.11. They just continued to pay the license/maintenance fee. When the license was about to expire, the "time-out" message would show saying how many days until exipration. . .
Joined: 09 Mar 2011 Posts: 7312 Location: Inside the Matrix
610 hits on google. So not the only site, so probably not blunder.
I suppose the old version is cheaper.
The nice guys are having a competition. I managed to hex Vasanthz with his prediction of Tendulkar's score, got a lucky "collateral" on Anuj (did you see the way he dissed that guy), now I just need to nobble Ed and the prize is mine... ALL MINE!
Anyway, if AIG want to hunt him down, he's left enough clues.
Oh. This isn't a PM, is it? Looks like I've nobbled myself, as the late Frankier Howerd might have said...
