IBM Mainframe Forum Index
 
Log In
 
IBM Mainframe Forum Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Register
 

Diffrence between physical tape and virtual tape.


IBM Mainframe Forums -> All Other Mainframe Topics
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
amitkumar_sindhi

New User


Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:39 pm
Reply with quote

I want to know what is the difference between physical tape and a virtual tape? Which is better and why?

regards,
Amit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
die7nadal

Active User


Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 156

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:35 pm
Reply with quote

I wud answer from the programmers perspective, I hope u meant Tape drives by saying 'Tape'. A Virtual Tape drive emulates the physical tape drive. This was introduced to overcome the shortage of physical tape drives as they were costly.

If a job accesses a huge number of tapes silmultaneously, u wud have coded the JCL to have DD DSN=TAPE,UNIT=AFF=DDNAME to retain the Drive used by a previous DDNAME. But now after the Virtual tape u wud have sufficient drives and u dont have to use the same drives again and again. Ofcourse the Physical tape drive is faster, but that is insignificant compared to it ROI. For a detailed architecture visit http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/FRAMESET/EZ3CAH00/CCONTENTS?DT=19990412142331
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic View Bookmarks
All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Forum Index -> All Other Mainframe Topics

 


Similar Topics
Topic Forum Replies
No new posts CLIST - Virtual storage allocation error CLIST & REXX 5
No new posts Rotate partition-logical & physic... DB2 0
No new posts Deleting a Tape file JCL & VSAM 14
No new posts JCL and TAPE drives: how to maximize ... JCL & VSAM 9
No new posts ADR324E-VOL/DATASET SPECIFIED BY DDNA... JCL & VSAM 6
Search our Forums:

Back to Top